Booster Dose of Bacille Calmette-Guérin Vaccine for Tuberculosis in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

O. Oduwole, J. Mwankon, J. Okebe, Ekpereonne Esu, M. Chibuzor, A. Sallahdeen, D. Arikpo, C. Meremikwu, E. Effa, M. Meremikwu
{"title":"Booster Dose of Bacille Calmette-Guérin Vaccine for Tuberculosis in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review","authors":"O. Oduwole, J. Mwankon, J. Okebe, Ekpereonne Esu, M. Chibuzor, A. Sallahdeen, D. Arikpo, C. Meremikwu, E. Effa, M. Meremikwu","doi":"10.30442/ahr.0703-04-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, given as a single dose, offers variable protection against Tuberculosis (TB). It is plausible that repeat doses could improve the effectiveness of the BCG vaccine in settings where the population remain at risk of the disease. \nObjective: To assess the effectiveness of BCG revaccination as a booster dose in preventing TB in Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs). \nMethods: We searched the electronic databases without language or publication restrictions and followed the procedures for preparing systematic reviews, including assessing the risk of bias as outlined in the Cochrane handbook. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in LMICs involving children and adults receiving one or more BCG vaccine doses after the primary BCG vaccination. The incidence of severe forms of TB, active TB and adverse events were the primary outcomes. \nResults: Five RCTs were included in this systematic review. Revaccination with BCG probably makes little or no difference to the risk of active TB measured after five years (Relative risk (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.51; 348,083 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence) or nine years post-revaccination (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12; 348,083 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence). In populations with HIV co-infection, revaccination probably increases the risk of pulmonary tuberculosis compared to placebo (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.01; 46,764 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence). \nConclusion: The available evidence suggests that BCG revaccination probably makes little or no difference in preventing tuberculosis disease in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":52960,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30442/ahr.0703-04-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, given as a single dose, offers variable protection against Tuberculosis (TB). It is plausible that repeat doses could improve the effectiveness of the BCG vaccine in settings where the population remain at risk of the disease. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of BCG revaccination as a booster dose in preventing TB in Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs). Methods: We searched the electronic databases without language or publication restrictions and followed the procedures for preparing systematic reviews, including assessing the risk of bias as outlined in the Cochrane handbook. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in LMICs involving children and adults receiving one or more BCG vaccine doses after the primary BCG vaccination. The incidence of severe forms of TB, active TB and adverse events were the primary outcomes. Results: Five RCTs were included in this systematic review. Revaccination with BCG probably makes little or no difference to the risk of active TB measured after five years (Relative risk (RR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.51; 348,083 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence) or nine years post-revaccination (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.12; 348,083 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence). In populations with HIV co-infection, revaccination probably increases the risk of pulmonary tuberculosis compared to placebo (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.01; 46,764 participants; one study, moderate certainty evidence). Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that BCG revaccination probably makes little or no difference in preventing tuberculosis disease in LMICs.
低收入和中等收入国家结核病疫苗加强剂量的系统评价
背景:卡介苗(BCG)单剂接种,对结核病(TB)有不同的保护作用。在人群仍有患病风险的情况下,重复接种可以提高BCG疫苗的有效性,这是有道理的。目的:评估低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)接种BCG作为加强剂预防结核病的有效性。方法:我们在没有语言或出版限制的情况下搜索电子数据库,并遵循准备系统综述的程序,包括评估Cochrane手册中概述的偏见风险。我们纳入了在LMIC中进行的随机对照试验(RCT),涉及在初次接种BCG疫苗后接受一剂或多剂BCG疫苗的儿童和成人。严重结核病、活动性结核病和不良事件的发生率是主要结果。结果:本系统综述包括5项随机对照试验。BCG再接种可能对五年后测量的活动性结核病风险几乎没有影响(相对风险(RR)1.16,95%CI 0.88-1.51;348083名参与者;一项研究,中等确定性证据)或重新接种疫苗后九年(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.82至1.12;348083名参与者;一项研究:中等确定性证明)。在HIV合并感染人群中,与安慰剂相比,重新接种疫苗可能会增加患肺结核的风险(RR 1.74,95%CI 1.00至3.01;46764名参与者;一项研究,中等确定性证据)。结论:现有证据表明,重新接种BCG可能对预防LMIC中的结核病几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信