The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of variable frequency intensity has a longer-lasting analgesic action than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in cancer pain
Juliana Carvalho Schleder, Fernanda Aparecida Verner, Loriane Mauda, Débora Melo Mazzo, L. Fernandes
下载PDF
{"title":"The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of variable frequency intensity has a longer-lasting analgesic action than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in cancer pain","authors":"Juliana Carvalho Schleder, Fernanda Aparecida Verner, Loriane Mauda, Débora Melo Mazzo, L. Fernandes","doi":"10.5935/1806-0013.20170122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms in cancer, and physical therapy offers non-invasive methods such as the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the relief of symptoms. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with variable intensity frequency in cancer pain. METHODS: This study was conducted with 53 patients of the Hospital Erasto Gaertner, divided into two groups: burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pain assessment was performed before and right after the electroanalgesia, and at every hour until completing 6 hours. RESULTS: The group treated with burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation maintained complete analgesia for 2 hours, returning to the initial score value within 6 hours of evaluation; the group of variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation maintained complete analgesia for 4 hours, not returning to the initial score value within the 6 hours. When comparing the intensity of the pain between the groups there was a significant difference between them (p<0.001) in all the assessments from the third hour after the electroanalgesia, showing a significant difference (p<0.001) at the 3rd and 4th hour after the electroanalgesia. There was no difference at the 5th hour and at the 6th hour. CONCLUSION: The variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided a longer-lasting analgeThe transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of variable frequency intensity has a longer-lasting analgesic action than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in cancer pain Estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea de intensidade e frequência variável tem ação analgésica mais duradoura que a estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea burst sobre a dor oncológica Juliana Carvalho Schleder1, Fernanda Aparecida Verner2, Loriane Mauda3, Débora Melo Mazzo4, Luiz Cláudio Fernandes5 1. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Hospital Universitário Regional dos Campos Gerais, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil. 2. Hospital Cajuru, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. 3. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curso de Medicina, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. 4. Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Hospital Universitário Regional dos Campos Gerais, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil. 5. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Fisiologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Submitted in May 10, 2017. Accepted for publication in October 30, 2017. Conflict of interests: none – Sponsoring sources: none Correspondence to: Rua Cruz e Souza no 430 ap. 11 – Jardim Carvalho 84015-420 Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil E-mail: deboramazzo@uol.com.br © Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor sia in cancer pain than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.","PeriodicalId":30846,"journal":{"name":"Revista Dor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5935/1806-0013.20170122","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Dor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-0013.20170122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
引用
批量引用
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms in cancer, and physical therapy offers non-invasive methods such as the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the relief of symptoms. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with variable intensity frequency in cancer pain. METHODS: This study was conducted with 53 patients of the Hospital Erasto Gaertner, divided into two groups: burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pain assessment was performed before and right after the electroanalgesia, and at every hour until completing 6 hours. RESULTS: The group treated with burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation maintained complete analgesia for 2 hours, returning to the initial score value within 6 hours of evaluation; the group of variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation maintained complete analgesia for 4 hours, not returning to the initial score value within the 6 hours. When comparing the intensity of the pain between the groups there was a significant difference between them (p<0.001) in all the assessments from the third hour after the electroanalgesia, showing a significant difference (p<0.001) at the 3rd and 4th hour after the electroanalgesia. There was no difference at the 5th hour and at the 6th hour. CONCLUSION: The variable intensity frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided a longer-lasting analgeThe transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of variable frequency intensity has a longer-lasting analgesic action than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in cancer pain Estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea de intensidade e frequência variável tem ação analgésica mais duradoura que a estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea burst sobre a dor oncológica Juliana Carvalho Schleder1, Fernanda Aparecida Verner2, Loriane Mauda3, Débora Melo Mazzo4, Luiz Cláudio Fernandes5 1. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Hospital Universitário Regional dos Campos Gerais, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil. 2. Hospital Cajuru, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. 3. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curso de Medicina, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. 4. Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Hospital Universitário Regional dos Campos Gerais, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil. 5. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Fisiologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Submitted in May 10, 2017. Accepted for publication in October 30, 2017. Conflict of interests: none – Sponsoring sources: none Correspondence to: Rua Cruz e Souza no 430 ap. 11 – Jardim Carvalho 84015-420 Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil E-mail: deboramazzo@uol.com.br © Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor sia in cancer pain than the burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
变频强度经皮神经电刺激对癌症疼痛的镇痛作用比突发性经皮神经刺激更持久
背景与目的:疼痛是癌症最常见的症状之一,物理治疗提供了非侵入性的方法,如经皮神经电刺激来缓解症状。本研究的目的是比较突发性经皮神经电刺激和经皮可变强度频率神经电刺激治疗癌症疼痛的效果。方法:本研究采用Erasto-Gaertner医院53例患者,分为两组:爆裂型经皮神经电刺激和变强度频率经皮神经刺激。在电镇痛之前和之后立即进行疼痛评估,并在每小时进行一次,直到完成6小时。结果:爆裂性经皮神经电刺激组维持完全镇痛2小时,在评价后6小时内恢复到初始评分值;可变强度频率经皮神经电刺激组维持完全镇痛4h,6h内未恢复到初始评分值。当比较两组之间的疼痛强度时,从电镇痛后第3小时开始的所有评估中,两组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001),在电镇痛后的第3和第4小时显示出显著差异(p<0.001)。在第5小时和第6小时没有差异。结论:变频经皮神经电刺激对癌症疼痛具有比突发性经皮神经刺激更持久的镇痛作用这是一个由Juliana Carvalho Schleder1、Fernanda Aparecida Verner2、Loriane Mauda3、Débora Melo Mazzo4、Luiz Cláudio Fernandes 5 1组成的神经传导神经爆裂的评估。巴拉那联邦大学、坎波斯-杰雷斯地区大学医院、巴西蓬塔格罗萨财政部。2.巴西库里蒂巴Fisioterapia省Cajuru医院。3.巴西库里蒂巴医学院巴拉那天主教大学。4.蓬塔格罗萨大学,坎波斯-杰雷斯地区大学医院,财政部,蓬塔格罗沙,巴西。5.巴拉那联邦大学,巴西库里蒂巴财政部。2017年5月10日提交。2017年10月30日接受出版。利益冲突:无-赞助来源:无通信:Rua Cruz e Souza,第430页。11–Jardim Carvalho 84015-420 Ponta Grossa,PR,Brasil电子邮件:deboramazzo@uol.com.br©Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor sia治疗癌症疼痛比突发性经皮神经电刺激更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。