Evaluation of Soil Compaction in Building Construction Projects

W. Diana, E. Hartono, A. Muntohar, Kartika Wulandary
{"title":"Evaluation of Soil Compaction in Building Construction Projects","authors":"W. Diana, E. Hartono, A. Muntohar, Kartika Wulandary","doi":"10.14710/mkts.v28i1.32720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil compaction is one of the robust methods to improve the strength and compressibility of earthwork since the method is more efficient and practical. However, the compaction work must be evaluated to meet the maximum dry density (MDD) required from the standard laboratory compaction test. The common method used for the evaluation of field density is the sand-cone test. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relative compaction of the borrow-fill at the building construction using the sand-cone test. The test procedure followed the ASTM D1556/D1556M-15e1 and ASTM D698-12e2 for sand-cone test and Proctor standard compaction test. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the density and moisture obtained from the field test at Dorm and Research and Innovation Center (RIC) project construction. The probability (p) of the compaction work exceeded the 0,9 MDD or Rc=90% was calculated p=13% and p=18%. The results corresponded to average relative compaction (Rc) of 80% and 82% at the Dorm and RIC project, respectively, with the deviation standard of 8.69 dan 8.81.","PeriodicalId":31880,"journal":{"name":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v28i1.32720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction is one of the robust methods to improve the strength and compressibility of earthwork since the method is more efficient and practical. However, the compaction work must be evaluated to meet the maximum dry density (MDD) required from the standard laboratory compaction test. The common method used for the evaluation of field density is the sand-cone test. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relative compaction of the borrow-fill at the building construction using the sand-cone test. The test procedure followed the ASTM D1556/D1556M-15e1 and ASTM D698-12e2 for sand-cone test and Proctor standard compaction test. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the density and moisture obtained from the field test at Dorm and Research and Innovation Center (RIC) project construction. The probability (p) of the compaction work exceeded the 0,9 MDD or Rc=90% was calculated p=13% and p=18%. The results corresponded to average relative compaction (Rc) of 80% and 82% at the Dorm and RIC project, respectively, with the deviation standard of 8.69 dan 8.81.
建筑施工项目土壤压实评价
土壤压实是提高土方强度和压缩性的稳健方法之一,因为该方法更有效、更实用。但是,必须对压实工作进行评估,以满足标准实验室压实试验所要求的最大干密度(MDD)。用于评估场地密度的常用方法是砂锥试验。本研究的主要目的是利用砂锥试验研究建筑施工中取土填土的相对压实度。试验程序遵循ASTM D1556/D1556M-15e1和ASTM D698-12e2的砂锥试验和Proctor标准压实试验。对Dorm和研究与创新中心(RIC)项目施工现场测试中获得的密度和湿度进行了统计分析。压实作业超过0.9 MDD或Rc=90%的概率(p)计算为p=13%和p=18%。结果表明,Dorm和RIC项目的平均相对压实度(Rc)分别为80%和82%,偏差标准分别为8.69和8.81。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书