The Political Economy of Populist Reason in The Netherlands

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Simon Tunderman
{"title":"The Political Economy of Populist Reason in The Netherlands","authors":"Simon Tunderman","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2129923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that the appeal of different populist parties in the Netherlands should be understood against the backdrop of class dynamics in the Dutch economy. Changes in the structure of capital accumulation have led to a rise in precarious working conditions, and real estate increasingly functions as an investment opportunity, causing housing prices to skyrocket. The resulting political-economic crisis dynamic constitutes fruitful ground for populist opposition voices. Adopting Ernesto Laclau’s framework, the article analyzes the 2021 election programs of three populist parties to trace the contingent articulations of economic demands in wider constructions of “the people.” Radical right-wing populist parties, such as Partij voor de Vrijheid and Forum voor Democratie articulate class demands as part of broader populist projects based on xenophobic exclusions or “globalist” conspiracy theories. On the left, the Socialist Party constructs a more classical opposition between workers and capitalists. The article is theoretically innovative insofar as it shows how populist reason and contingent class dynamics can be considered from a comprehensive perspective.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2129923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that the appeal of different populist parties in the Netherlands should be understood against the backdrop of class dynamics in the Dutch economy. Changes in the structure of capital accumulation have led to a rise in precarious working conditions, and real estate increasingly functions as an investment opportunity, causing housing prices to skyrocket. The resulting political-economic crisis dynamic constitutes fruitful ground for populist opposition voices. Adopting Ernesto Laclau’s framework, the article analyzes the 2021 election programs of three populist parties to trace the contingent articulations of economic demands in wider constructions of “the people.” Radical right-wing populist parties, such as Partij voor de Vrijheid and Forum voor Democratie articulate class demands as part of broader populist projects based on xenophobic exclusions or “globalist” conspiracy theories. On the left, the Socialist Party constructs a more classical opposition between workers and capitalists. The article is theoretically innovative insofar as it shows how populist reason and contingent class dynamics can be considered from a comprehensive perspective.
荷兰民粹主义理性的政治经济学
摘要本文认为,应在荷兰经济的阶级动态背景下理解荷兰不同民粹主义政党的吸引力。资本积累结构的变化导致不稳定工作条件的增加,房地产越来越多地成为一种投资机会,导致房价飙升。由此产生的政治经济危机动态为民粹主义反对派的声音提供了肥沃的土壤。本文采用埃内斯托·拉克劳的框架,分析了2021年三个民粹主义政党的选举计划,以追踪在更广泛的“人民”建构中经济需求的偶然表达。激进的右翼民粹主义政党,如自由意志党(Partij voor de Vrijheid)和民主意志论坛(Forum voor democracy),将阶级诉求作为基于排外主义或“全球主义”阴谋论的更广泛民粹主义计划的一部分。在左翼,社会党在工人和资本家之间构建了一种更为经典的对立。这篇文章在理论上是创新的,因为它展示了如何从一个全面的角度来考虑民粹主义的原因和偶然的阶级动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信