Configuring the agricultural platforms: farmers' preferences for design attributes

IF 2.4 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Neeraj Singh, Sanjeev Kapoor
{"title":"Configuring the agricultural platforms: farmers' preferences for design attributes","authors":"Neeraj Singh, Sanjeev Kapoor","doi":"10.1108/jadee-09-2022-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAlthough growing Internet penetration in the hinterlands has attracted agribusinesses to promote digital platforms, farmers are sceptical about using them. The literature discusses agricultural platforms from the theoretical perspective of technological determinism, where the platforms are developed and promoted by firms in a top-down manner to be accepted by farmers. However, this approach results in poorly configured platforms with limited utility for farmers. It is evident from the existing literature that the mere creation of a platform business is not sufficient to guarantee adoption by users. Hence, this study explores how to make the agricultural platform more attractive for farmers.Design/methodology/approachThe present study is based on a discrete choice experiment performed on 126 Indian farmers using agricultural platforms. The data were analysed using the conditional logistic regression method.FindingsThe study suggests that farmers expect government and cooperative entities to be also embedded with the platforms. Complementary features such as prompt service, competitive pricing and farm credit were identified as essential attributes. Further, the platforms should enable smallholders to trade farm produce by providing a mechanism for real-time online nudging and bargaining with buyers.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is based on the applications of random utility theory. The research has utility for Agtech managers, cooperative institutions and agricultural policymakers.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies focussing on agricultural platform design from the farmers' perspective. The study implies that incorporating preferred attributes can help practitioners configure platforms to benefit farmers with prospects concerning farm management decisions.","PeriodicalId":45976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-09-2022-0204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeAlthough growing Internet penetration in the hinterlands has attracted agribusinesses to promote digital platforms, farmers are sceptical about using them. The literature discusses agricultural platforms from the theoretical perspective of technological determinism, where the platforms are developed and promoted by firms in a top-down manner to be accepted by farmers. However, this approach results in poorly configured platforms with limited utility for farmers. It is evident from the existing literature that the mere creation of a platform business is not sufficient to guarantee adoption by users. Hence, this study explores how to make the agricultural platform more attractive for farmers.Design/methodology/approachThe present study is based on a discrete choice experiment performed on 126 Indian farmers using agricultural platforms. The data were analysed using the conditional logistic regression method.FindingsThe study suggests that farmers expect government and cooperative entities to be also embedded with the platforms. Complementary features such as prompt service, competitive pricing and farm credit were identified as essential attributes. Further, the platforms should enable smallholders to trade farm produce by providing a mechanism for real-time online nudging and bargaining with buyers.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is based on the applications of random utility theory. The research has utility for Agtech managers, cooperative institutions and agricultural policymakers.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies focussing on agricultural platform design from the farmers' perspective. The study implies that incorporating preferred attributes can help practitioners configure platforms to benefit farmers with prospects concerning farm management decisions.
配置农业平台:农民对设计属性的偏好
目的尽管内陆地区日益增长的互联网普及率吸引了农业综合企业推广数字平台,但农民对使用这些平台持怀疑态度。文献从技术决定论的理论角度讨论了农业平台,其中平台由企业以自上而下的方式开发和推广,以被农民接受。然而,这种方法导致平台配置不当,对农民的效用有限。从现有文献中可以明显看出,仅仅创建一个平台业务不足以保证用户的采用。因此,本研究探讨了如何使农业平台对农民更有吸引力。设计/方法/方法本研究基于126名印度农民使用农业平台进行的离散选择实验。使用条件逻辑回归方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,农民希望政府和合作实体也能嵌入这些平台。诸如及时服务、有竞争力的价格和农业信贷等补充特征被确定为基本特征。此外,这些平台应通过提供实时在线推送和与买家讨价还价的机制,使小农户能够进行农产品交易。研究局限性/含义本研究基于随机效用理论的应用。这项研究对农业技术管理人员、合作机构和农业政策制定者都有用。创意/价值这是第一批从农民角度关注农业平台设计的研究之一。该研究表明,结合偏好属性可以帮助从业者配置平台,使农民受益于农场管理决策的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies publishes double-blind peer-reviewed research on issues relevant to agriculture and food value chain in emerging economies in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe. The journal welcomes original research, particularly empirical/applied, quantitative and qualitative work on topics pertaining to policies, processes, and practices in the agribusiness arena in emerging economies to inform researchers, practitioners and policy makers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信