Identification of potential hazard of consumption of novel products to public health (systematic review)

Q4 Medicine
P. Shur, D. V. Suvorov, S. Zelenkin, D. N. Lir
{"title":"Identification of potential hazard of consumption of novel products to public health (systematic review)","authors":"P. Shur, D. V. Suvorov, S. Zelenkin, D. N. Lir","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-495-501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Declining volumes of meat production are associated, among other things, with fight against global warming. This unavoidably stimulates the scientific community to look for alternative sources of protein. However, novel foods can pose a potential health threat for consumers. \nThe aim was to search for data on a potential threat for human health posed by consuming the most widely spread novel foods. \nMaterials and methods. To achieve that, we accomplished a systematic review of relevant information sources using PRISMA recommendations on how to perform a systemic review of research articles. Overall, we analyzed more than two thousand sources to identify their relevance to the aim of this study; ultimately 64 sources were selected for analysis. \nResults. Within this review, three groups of novel foods of animal origin were identified and considered. They were the most frequently mentioned in studies investigating potential health hazards for humans. We analyzed these potential hazards caused by consuming novel foods; it was established that attention should be paid to probable changes in biological values of protein in a novel food, undeclared or unintended chemicals in it, and hyper-reactivity of the human immune system. Besides, when insect or GM-animal proteins are used as food raw materials, a probability of pathogenic microorganisms in them should not be neglected. A distinctive feature of foods manufactured from GM-animals is estimation of a potential hazard associated with probable transfer of changed genes to the opportunistic gut microflora. \nLimitations. The study addressing potential health hazards posed by consumption of new foods considered only ‘new food products’ of animal origin. \nConclusion. The systemic review of relevant information sources was aimed to identify potential health hazards posed by consumption of novel food of animal origin and allowed fulfilling hazard identification as the first stage in health risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":12550,"journal":{"name":"Gigiena i sanitariia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gigiena i sanitariia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-495-501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Declining volumes of meat production are associated, among other things, with fight against global warming. This unavoidably stimulates the scientific community to look for alternative sources of protein. However, novel foods can pose a potential health threat for consumers. The aim was to search for data on a potential threat for human health posed by consuming the most widely spread novel foods. Materials and methods. To achieve that, we accomplished a systematic review of relevant information sources using PRISMA recommendations on how to perform a systemic review of research articles. Overall, we analyzed more than two thousand sources to identify their relevance to the aim of this study; ultimately 64 sources were selected for analysis. Results. Within this review, three groups of novel foods of animal origin were identified and considered. They were the most frequently mentioned in studies investigating potential health hazards for humans. We analyzed these potential hazards caused by consuming novel foods; it was established that attention should be paid to probable changes in biological values of protein in a novel food, undeclared or unintended chemicals in it, and hyper-reactivity of the human immune system. Besides, when insect or GM-animal proteins are used as food raw materials, a probability of pathogenic microorganisms in them should not be neglected. A distinctive feature of foods manufactured from GM-animals is estimation of a potential hazard associated with probable transfer of changed genes to the opportunistic gut microflora. Limitations. The study addressing potential health hazards posed by consumption of new foods considered only ‘new food products’ of animal origin. Conclusion. The systemic review of relevant information sources was aimed to identify potential health hazards posed by consumption of novel food of animal origin and allowed fulfilling hazard identification as the first stage in health risk assessment.
识别消费新产品对公共卫生的潜在危害(系统评价)
介绍。肉类产量的下降,除其他事项外,与应对全球变暖有关。这不可避免地刺激了科学界寻找蛋白质的替代来源。然而,新型食品可能对消费者的健康构成潜在威胁。其目的是寻找有关食用最广泛传播的新型食品对人类健康构成潜在威胁的数据。材料和方法。为了实现这一目标,我们使用PRISMA关于如何对研究文章进行系统审查的建议完成了对相关信息源的系统审查。总的来说,我们分析了2000多个来源,以确定它们与本研究目的的相关性;最终选择64个来源进行分析。结果。在本综述中,确定并考虑了三组新型动物源性食品。它们是调查人类潜在健康危害的研究中最常提到的。我们分析了食用新型食品所带来的潜在危害;人们已经确定,应该注意一种新食物中蛋白质的生物学价值可能发生的变化,其中未申报或意外的化学物质,以及人体免疫系统的高度反应性。此外,当使用昆虫或转基因动物蛋白作为食品原料时,其中存在致病微生物的可能性也不容忽视。用转基因动物生产的食品的一个显著特征是,对改变后的基因可能转移到机会性肠道菌群的潜在危害进行评估。的局限性。针对食用新食品可能造成的健康危害的研究只考虑了动物源性的“新食品”。结论。对相关信息来源进行系统审查的目的是识别消费动物源性新型食品可能造成的健康危害,并将危害识别作为健康风险评估的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gigiena i sanitariia
Gigiena i sanitariia Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信