Central Venoplasty in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Mohammed Aljarie, M. Alahmari, M. Arabi
{"title":"Central Venoplasty in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices","authors":"Mohammed Aljarie, M. Alahmari, M. Arabi","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1730121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the central venous angioplasty in patients with central venous occlusion and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) without lead extraction. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was used to evaluate the effectiveness of 37 central venous angioplasty procedure for 15 patients with CIED without lead extraction. Results Technical success was achieved in 97% (n = 36/37) and clinical success was achieved in 89% (33/37) of the procedures. One procedure failed recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the left subclavian vein, and the patient required fistula embolization due to severe arm swelling. Another procedure failed initially to recanalize long-segment occlusion involving the right subclavian vein/brachiocephalic vein and superior vena cava in a patient with a history of Hickman line and left-sided CIED. This was successfully recanalized and angioplastied on a subsequent session. No lead fracture or dislodgment was documented in any procedure. No procedure-related complication was documented within 2 weeks after the angioplasty. Six-month primary patency was achieved in 62% (23/37) of the procedures. Ten patients (66%) required an average of 1.4 reinterventions (range: 1–4 interventions) during the follow-up time with mean time to reintervention of 318 days (5–1,380 days). Two patients required early reinterventions within 10 days due to catheter dysfunction. Conclusion Findings of this study support the existing evidence on the safety and effectiveness of balloon angioplasty without lead extraction.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"5 1","pages":"030 - 034"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1730121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the central venous angioplasty in patients with central venous occlusion and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) without lead extraction. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was used to evaluate the effectiveness of 37 central venous angioplasty procedure for 15 patients with CIED without lead extraction. Results Technical success was achieved in 97% (n = 36/37) and clinical success was achieved in 89% (33/37) of the procedures. One procedure failed recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the left subclavian vein, and the patient required fistula embolization due to severe arm swelling. Another procedure failed initially to recanalize long-segment occlusion involving the right subclavian vein/brachiocephalic vein and superior vena cava in a patient with a history of Hickman line and left-sided CIED. This was successfully recanalized and angioplastied on a subsequent session. No lead fracture or dislodgment was documented in any procedure. No procedure-related complication was documented within 2 weeks after the angioplasty. Six-month primary patency was achieved in 62% (23/37) of the procedures. Ten patients (66%) required an average of 1.4 reinterventions (range: 1–4 interventions) during the follow-up time with mean time to reintervention of 318 days (5–1,380 days). Two patients required early reinterventions within 10 days due to catheter dysfunction. Conclusion Findings of this study support the existing evidence on the safety and effectiveness of balloon angioplasty without lead extraction.
心脏植入式电子装置患者的中心静脉成形术
摘要目的评价中心静脉闭塞合并心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)患者中心静脉成形术不拔铅的安全性和有效性。材料与方法回顾性分析15例CIED患者37例中心静脉成形术不拔铅的疗效。结果技术成功率97% (n = 36/37),临床成功率89%(33/37)。一例慢性完全闭塞的左锁骨下静脉再通失败,患者由于严重的手臂肿胀需要瘘栓塞。另一项手术最初未能再通长段闭塞,包括右锁骨下静脉/头臂静脉和上腔静脉,患者有Hickman线和左侧CIED病史。这是成功的再通和血管成形术在随后的会议。在任何程序中均未记录铅骨折或脱位。血管成形术后2周内未发生手术相关并发症。62%(23/37)的手术在6个月的时间内实现了初级通畅。10例患者(66%)在随访期间平均需要1.4次再干预(范围:1-4次干预),平均再干预时间为318天(5 - 1380天)。2例患者因导管功能障碍在10天内需要早期再干预。结论本研究结果支持了无铅球囊血管成形术的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信