International politics of migration in times of ‘crisis’ and Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
M. Koinova, F. Düvell, F. Kalantzi, S. de Jong, C. Kaunert, M. Marchand
{"title":"International politics of migration in times of ‘crisis’ and Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"M. Koinova, F. Düvell, F. Kalantzi, S. de Jong, C. Kaunert, M. Marchand","doi":"10.1093/migration/mnac039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A much-anticipated end of the COVID-19 pandemic is on the horizon. It is important to reflect on the ways in which the pandemic has impacted the international politics of migration and especially on the migration-security nexus, which is still little understood but affecting policies and population movements with future implications. How the pandemic has shaped tradeoffs between securitization of migration, health, and economic concerns in governing migration? What are the new trends emerging from the pandemic on the migration-security nexus? And how can we study these in the coming years? This Research Note features insights from scholars associated with the British International Studies Association’s working group on the ‘International Politics of Migration, Refugees and Diaspora’. They argue that the pandemic has exacerbated tendencies for migration control beyond reinforcing nation-state borders, namely through foregrounding ‘riskification’ of migration discourses and practices, adding to an earlier existing securitization of migration considered as a ‘threat’. Digital controls at borders and beyond were ramped up, as were racial tropes and discrimination against migrants and mobile persons more generally. These trends deepen the restrictions on liberal freedoms during a period of global democratic backsliding, but also trigger a counter-movement where the visibility of migrants as ‘key workers’ and their deservingness in host societies has been enhanced, and diasporas became more connected to their countries of origin. This Research Note finds that enhanced controls, on the one side, and openings for visibility of migrants and transnational connectivity of diasporas, on the other, are worthy to study in the future as political trends per se. Yet, it would be also interesting to study them as interconnected in a dual movement of simultaneous restriction and inclusion, and in an interdependent world where the power of nation-states has been reasserted due to the pandemic, but migrant transnationalism has remained largely intact.","PeriodicalId":46309,"journal":{"name":"Migration Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A much-anticipated end of the COVID-19 pandemic is on the horizon. It is important to reflect on the ways in which the pandemic has impacted the international politics of migration and especially on the migration-security nexus, which is still little understood but affecting policies and population movements with future implications. How the pandemic has shaped tradeoffs between securitization of migration, health, and economic concerns in governing migration? What are the new trends emerging from the pandemic on the migration-security nexus? And how can we study these in the coming years? This Research Note features insights from scholars associated with the British International Studies Association’s working group on the ‘International Politics of Migration, Refugees and Diaspora’. They argue that the pandemic has exacerbated tendencies for migration control beyond reinforcing nation-state borders, namely through foregrounding ‘riskification’ of migration discourses and practices, adding to an earlier existing securitization of migration considered as a ‘threat’. Digital controls at borders and beyond were ramped up, as were racial tropes and discrimination against migrants and mobile persons more generally. These trends deepen the restrictions on liberal freedoms during a period of global democratic backsliding, but also trigger a counter-movement where the visibility of migrants as ‘key workers’ and their deservingness in host societies has been enhanced, and diasporas became more connected to their countries of origin. This Research Note finds that enhanced controls, on the one side, and openings for visibility of migrants and transnational connectivity of diasporas, on the other, are worthy to study in the future as political trends per se. Yet, it would be also interesting to study them as interconnected in a dual movement of simultaneous restriction and inclusion, and in an interdependent world where the power of nation-states has been reasserted due to the pandemic, but migrant transnationalism has remained largely intact.
“危机”时期和新冠肺炎大流行之后的国际移民政治
备受期待的2019冠状病毒病大流行即将结束。必须反思这一大流行病对国际移徙政治的影响,特别是对移徙与安全关系的影响,这一关系目前仍知之甚少,但影响着政策和人口流动,并对未来产生影响。大流行如何在移民管理中形成移民证券化、健康和经济问题之间的权衡?疫情在移民与安全关系方面出现了哪些新趋势?我们如何在未来几年研究这些?本研究报告的特色是与英国国际研究协会“移民、难民和侨民的国际政治”工作组有关的学者的见解。他们认为,大流行加剧了移民控制的趋势,超出了加强民族国家边界的范围,即通过突出移民话语和实践的“风险化”,增加了早先存在的被视为“威胁”的移民证券化。边境内外的数字控制加强了,对移民和流动人员的种族歧视和歧视也更普遍。在全球民主倒退的时期,这些趋势加深了对自由主义自由的限制,但也引发了一场反运动,在这场运动中,移民作为“关键工人”的可见度和他们在东道国社会的应得性得到了提高,散居者与原籍国的联系更加紧密。本研究报告发现,一方面,加强控制,另一方面,开放移民的可见性和散居者的跨国联系,作为政治趋势本身,值得在未来进行研究。然而,研究它们在同时限制和包容的双重运动中相互关联,以及在一个相互依存的世界中,由于大流行,民族国家的力量得到了重申,但移民跨国主义在很大程度上保持不变,这也会很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Migration Studies
Migration Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Migration shapes human society and inspires ground-breaking research efforts across many different academic disciplines and policy areas. Migration Studies contributes to the consolidation of this field of scholarship, developing the core concepts that link different disciplinary perspectives on migration. To this end, the journal welcomes full-length articles, research notes, and reviews of books, films and other media from those working across the social sciences in all parts of the world. Priority is given to methodological, comparative and theoretical advances. The journal also publishes occasional special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信