COVID-19: Is herd immunity the answer?

J. Robinson, I. Banerjee, B. Sathian
{"title":"COVID-19: Is herd immunity the answer?","authors":"J. Robinson, I. Banerjee, B. Sathian","doi":"10.3126/jaim.v9i2.32834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measures introduced by the vast majority of countries are to Abstract The current global figures of COVID-19 is still rising. Many countries have enforced lockdowns to safeguard its citizens, however in most cases this has been to the dire detriment of the economy. Most leaders and governments have been holding out and looking to the development of a vaccine to be the answer to this COVID-19 pandemic, however at this point in time and for the foreseeable future a viable and widely available vaccine is not likely to be developed. In juxtaposition to the conventional methods countries such as Singapore, Israel, Iceland, Portugal, The Netherlands, Sweden, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Taiwan and Turkey have adopted the concept of herd immunity. It is there for poignant and of the upmost importance that an alternate stratagem is developed and exercised to best facilitate the re-ignition of the country’s economy as well to best protect its citizens from the virus. Models such as herd immunity or a model based thereon are the most logical solution to attain this goal. At this time in the development of the global COVID-19 pandemic it is too early to conclude as to whether a fullyfledged lockdown is more effective and useful than the establishment of herd immunity. In order to achieve the goal of safeguarding the lives of a countries citizens as well as its economy, a mixed method of lockdown and herd immunity is advised. Individuals who are economically active and less susceptible to the virus should adopt the herd immunity model, whereas those who are elderly with concomitant comorbidities should exercise self-isolation and follow the lockdown model. The application of using both models simultaneously, will both capitalize on the advantages of either and negate the drawbacks thereof. This ultimately decreasing the loss of lives whilst still inducing a degree of herd immunity within the general populous. Jared Robinson1, Indrajit Banerjee1*, Brijesh Sathian2","PeriodicalId":75443,"journal":{"name":"Advances in internal medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"94-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jaim.v9i2.32834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The measures introduced by the vast majority of countries are to Abstract The current global figures of COVID-19 is still rising. Many countries have enforced lockdowns to safeguard its citizens, however in most cases this has been to the dire detriment of the economy. Most leaders and governments have been holding out and looking to the development of a vaccine to be the answer to this COVID-19 pandemic, however at this point in time and for the foreseeable future a viable and widely available vaccine is not likely to be developed. In juxtaposition to the conventional methods countries such as Singapore, Israel, Iceland, Portugal, The Netherlands, Sweden, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Taiwan and Turkey have adopted the concept of herd immunity. It is there for poignant and of the upmost importance that an alternate stratagem is developed and exercised to best facilitate the re-ignition of the country’s economy as well to best protect its citizens from the virus. Models such as herd immunity or a model based thereon are the most logical solution to attain this goal. At this time in the development of the global COVID-19 pandemic it is too early to conclude as to whether a fullyfledged lockdown is more effective and useful than the establishment of herd immunity. In order to achieve the goal of safeguarding the lives of a countries citizens as well as its economy, a mixed method of lockdown and herd immunity is advised. Individuals who are economically active and less susceptible to the virus should adopt the herd immunity model, whereas those who are elderly with concomitant comorbidities should exercise self-isolation and follow the lockdown model. The application of using both models simultaneously, will both capitalize on the advantages of either and negate the drawbacks thereof. This ultimately decreasing the loss of lives whilst still inducing a degree of herd immunity within the general populous. Jared Robinson1, Indrajit Banerjee1*, Brijesh Sathian2
COVID-19:群体免疫是答案吗?
当前,全球新冠肺炎疫情数字仍在上升。许多国家实施了封锁以保护其公民,但在大多数情况下,这对经济造成了严重损害。大多数领导人和政府一直在观望,希望开发出一种疫苗来应对COVID-19大流行,但在目前和可预见的未来,不太可能开发出一种可行且广泛可用的疫苗。在传统方法的同时,新加坡、以色列、冰岛、葡萄牙、荷兰、瑞典、香港、日本、韩国、印度尼西亚、台湾和土耳其等国家采用了群体免疫的概念。最重要的是,制定和实施一项替代战略,以最好地促进该国经济的重新启动,并最好地保护其公民免受病毒的侵害。群体免疫等模型或基于此的模型是实现这一目标的最合乎逻辑的解决方案。在全球COVID-19大流行发展的这个时候,断定全面封锁是否比建立群体免疫更有效和有用还为时过早。为了实现保护国民生命和经济的目标,建议采取封锁和群体免疫的混合方法。从事经济活动、不易感染新冠肺炎的个体应采取群体免疫模式,而伴有合并症的老年人应自我隔离并采取封锁模式。同时使用两种模型的应用,既可以利用其中一种的优点,又可以消除其缺点。这最终减少了生命损失,同时仍在普通民众中引起一定程度的群体免疫。Jared Robinson1, Indrajit banerje1 *, Brijesh Sathian2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信