Suspension training versus free weight training: effects on explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwers performance

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Mohamed Megahed, Zahraa Tarek
{"title":"Suspension training versus free weight training: effects on explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwers performance","authors":"Mohamed Megahed, Zahraa Tarek","doi":"10.15561/26649837.2023.0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim. This paper aims to compare the effects of two types of resistance training programs (suspension training and free weight training) on the explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwers performance.\nMaterial and Methods. Twenty-four male discus throwers (with an average age: 19.17 ± 0.99 years; body mass: 99.87 ± 3.63 kg; height: 177.23 ± 3.16 cm) were assigned into three groups (eight subjects in each group); suspension training (STG), free weight training (FWTG) and control (CG). For eight weeks, subjects underwent training consisting of three sessions a week. Prior to and after the training period, explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwing distance variables were measured. The explosive power was measured using the medicine ball throw (SLJT) and standing long jump (MBTT) tests. The dynamic balance was measured using the Y excursion balance test (YBT). The discus throwing distance was measured according to the IAAF rules (DTT).\nResults. The results showed that both experimental groups had a significant effect on MBTT, SLJT, and DTT compared to the control group. There was a significant difference in YBT favoring STG when compared to the FWTG and CG, and also, favoring FWTG when compared to CG in the three directions (anterior, posterolateral, and posteromedial). All three groups improved the tests from pre- to post-test.\nConclusions. We can conclude that suspension training and free weight training have created almost the same improvements in explosive power. Also, suspension training was more effective than free weight training for improving dynamic balance.","PeriodicalId":52407,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2023.0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. This paper aims to compare the effects of two types of resistance training programs (suspension training and free weight training) on the explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwers performance. Material and Methods. Twenty-four male discus throwers (with an average age: 19.17 ± 0.99 years; body mass: 99.87 ± 3.63 kg; height: 177.23 ± 3.16 cm) were assigned into three groups (eight subjects in each group); suspension training (STG), free weight training (FWTG) and control (CG). For eight weeks, subjects underwent training consisting of three sessions a week. Prior to and after the training period, explosive power, dynamic balance, and discus throwing distance variables were measured. The explosive power was measured using the medicine ball throw (SLJT) and standing long jump (MBTT) tests. The dynamic balance was measured using the Y excursion balance test (YBT). The discus throwing distance was measured according to the IAAF rules (DTT). Results. The results showed that both experimental groups had a significant effect on MBTT, SLJT, and DTT compared to the control group. There was a significant difference in YBT favoring STG when compared to the FWTG and CG, and also, favoring FWTG when compared to CG in the three directions (anterior, posterolateral, and posteromedial). All three groups improved the tests from pre- to post-test. Conclusions. We can conclude that suspension training and free weight training have created almost the same improvements in explosive power. Also, suspension training was more effective than free weight training for improving dynamic balance.
悬吊训练与自由重量训练:对爆发力、动态平衡和掷铁饼运动员表现的影响
背景与研究目的。本文旨在比较两种类型的阻力训练方案(悬吊训练和自由重量训练)对铁饼运动员爆发力、动平衡和成绩的影响。材料和方法。男子铁饼运动员24名,平均年龄19.17±0.99岁;体重:99.87±3.63 kg;身高:177.23±3.16 cm),分为3组(每组8名);悬吊训练(STG)、自由重量训练(FWTG)和控制(CG)。在八周的时间里,受试者接受了每周三次的训练。训练前后分别测量爆发力、动平衡、掷铁饼距离等变量。采用实心球投掷(SLJT)和立定跳远(MBTT)试验测定了运动员的爆发力。采用Y偏移平衡试验(YBT)测量动平衡。根据国际田联规则(DTT)测定铁饼投掷距离。结果显示,与对照组相比,两个实验组在MBTT、SLJT和DTT方面均有显著影响。与FWTG和CG相比,YBT更倾向于STG,并且在三个方向(前、后外侧和后内侧)上也更倾向于FWTG。所有三组都从测试前到测试后改进了测试。我们可以得出结论,悬吊训练和自由重量训练在爆发力方面产生了几乎相同的改善。此外,悬架训练比自由重量训练更有效地改善动态平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信