Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis after acetabular fracture fixation using a posterior approach: a retrospective study at a level 1 trauma center

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Joseph Kitchen, B. Hartley, D. Seligson
{"title":"Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis after acetabular fracture fixation using a posterior approach: a retrospective study at a level 1 trauma center","authors":"Joseph Kitchen, B. Hartley, D. Seligson","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication of acetabular fracture repair. After surgery, standard methods for HO prevention involve observation, radiation therapy, or a course of nonsteroidal antiinflammatories (indomethacin). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze the effectiveness of radiation and indomethacin as HO prophylaxis after acetabular fracture surgical repair. Data were analyzed from 117 patients who underwent stabilization of the acetabulum utilizing a posterior approach from 2016 to 2020. Patients were classified into three groups based on the postoperative therapy received: radiation therapy, indomethacin therapy, or no prophylaxis. Grade of HO for each patient was determined by examining pelvic radiographs using the Brooker classification system at the most recent follow-up. Incidence of total and severe HO was recorded for each group and compared. Demographics, follow-up time, injury severity, and other trauma characteristics also were reported. Statistics were calculated using a combination of analysis of the variance (ANOVA), chi square, and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Results: The indomethacin group was younger than the other two groups with a shorter average follow-up time. The radiation group demonstrated a lower incidence of severe and total HO compared to the control group. The indomethacin group had significantly less total HO than the control group. Conclusions: With a decreased incidence of severe HO in the radiation group compared to no prophylaxis, this study supports the utility of radiation therapy as HO prophylaxis following acetabular fracture repair using a posterior approach. It shows a trend indicating that indomethacin also may be useful. Level of Evidence: Level III.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"508 - 513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication of acetabular fracture repair. After surgery, standard methods for HO prevention involve observation, radiation therapy, or a course of nonsteroidal antiinflammatories (indomethacin). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze the effectiveness of radiation and indomethacin as HO prophylaxis after acetabular fracture surgical repair. Data were analyzed from 117 patients who underwent stabilization of the acetabulum utilizing a posterior approach from 2016 to 2020. Patients were classified into three groups based on the postoperative therapy received: radiation therapy, indomethacin therapy, or no prophylaxis. Grade of HO for each patient was determined by examining pelvic radiographs using the Brooker classification system at the most recent follow-up. Incidence of total and severe HO was recorded for each group and compared. Demographics, follow-up time, injury severity, and other trauma characteristics also were reported. Statistics were calculated using a combination of analysis of the variance (ANOVA), chi square, and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Results: The indomethacin group was younger than the other two groups with a shorter average follow-up time. The radiation group demonstrated a lower incidence of severe and total HO compared to the control group. The indomethacin group had significantly less total HO than the control group. Conclusions: With a decreased incidence of severe HO in the radiation group compared to no prophylaxis, this study supports the utility of radiation therapy as HO prophylaxis following acetabular fracture repair using a posterior approach. It shows a trend indicating that indomethacin also may be useful. Level of Evidence: Level III.
髋臼骨折后路固定术后异位骨化的预防:1级创伤中心的回顾性研究
背景:异位骨化(HO)是髋臼骨折修复的一种常见并发症。手术后,预防HO的标准方法包括观察、放射治疗或一个疗程的非甾体抗炎药(吲哚美辛)。方法:回顾性分析髋臼骨折手术后放疗和消炎痛预防HO的有效性。分析了2016年至2020年117名采用后路髋臼稳定术的患者的数据。根据术后接受的治疗将患者分为三组:放疗、消炎痛治疗或不预防。在最近的随访中,通过使用Brooker分类系统检查骨盆X线片来确定每位患者的HO等级。记录各组总HO和严重HO的发生率并进行比较。还报告了人口统计学、随访时间、损伤严重程度和其他创伤特征。采用方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验相结合的方法计算统计数据。结果:吲哚美辛组较其他两组年轻,平均随访时间较短。与对照组相比,放射治疗组的严重HO和总HO发生率较低。吲哚美辛组的总HO显著低于对照组。结论:与未进行预防相比,放射治疗组严重HO的发生率降低,本研究支持放射治疗作为髋臼骨折后路修复后HO预防的实用性。它显示了一种趋势,表明吲哚美辛也可能是有用的。证据级别:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信