Accuracy of Iranian Cameriere and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a population of Iranian children

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL
E. Salehi, E. Afshari, M. Fazel, Azizeh Karimian, Maysa Mallahi
{"title":"Accuracy of Iranian Cameriere and Willems methods for estimating dental age in a population of Iranian children","authors":"E. Salehi, E. Afshari, M. Fazel, Azizeh Karimian, Maysa Mallahi","doi":"10.1080/00085030.2022.2084927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Age estimation methods based on dental radiographs are of the most accurate and popular methods for age estimation. The accuracy of these methods might vary between different ethnic groups. Therefore, the present study was performed in order to evaluate and update the Cameriere dental age estimation method in a population of Iranian children and compare it with the Willems dental age estimation method. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed, using dental records and digital dental panoramic radiographs of 110 six- to 12-year-old patients (55 girls and 55 boys). In order to assess the accuracy of both methods, the difference between the estimated dental age and the Chronological age was calculated and compared. Results of the present study showed Willems method overestimated the age and the updated Iranian Cameriere method underestimated the age, but the over/underestimations were not significant, except for the boys in Willems group. Both Willems dental age estimation (WDA) and Iranian Cameriere dental age estimation (ICDA) methods were applicable in the selected population of Iranian children, although the WDA estimations were less accurate, especially for boys.","PeriodicalId":44383,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2022.2084927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Age estimation methods based on dental radiographs are of the most accurate and popular methods for age estimation. The accuracy of these methods might vary between different ethnic groups. Therefore, the present study was performed in order to evaluate and update the Cameriere dental age estimation method in a population of Iranian children and compare it with the Willems dental age estimation method. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed, using dental records and digital dental panoramic radiographs of 110 six- to 12-year-old patients (55 girls and 55 boys). In order to assess the accuracy of both methods, the difference between the estimated dental age and the Chronological age was calculated and compared. Results of the present study showed Willems method overestimated the age and the updated Iranian Cameriere method underestimated the age, but the over/underestimations were not significant, except for the boys in Willems group. Both Willems dental age estimation (WDA) and Iranian Cameriere dental age estimation (ICDA) methods were applicable in the selected population of Iranian children, although the WDA estimations were less accurate, especially for boys.
伊朗Cameriere和Willems方法估计伊朗儿童牙齿年龄的准确性
摘要基于牙片的年龄估计方法是最准确、最流行的年龄估计法。这些方法的准确性可能因种族而异。因此,本研究旨在评估和更新伊朗儿童群体中的Cameriere牙科年龄估计方法,并将其与Willems牙科年龄评估方法进行比较。对110名6至12岁的患者(55名女孩和55名男孩)进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,使用牙科记录和数字牙科全景照片。为了评估这两种方法的准确性,计算并比较了估计的牙齿年龄和按时间顺序排列的年龄之间的差异。本研究结果显示,Willems方法高估了年龄,而更新的伊朗Camerier方法低估了年龄,但高估/低估并不显著,Willemss组的男孩除外。Willems牙科年龄估计(WDA)和Iranian Cameriere牙科年龄评估(ICDA)方法均适用于选定的伊朗儿童群体,尽管WDA估计不太准确,尤其是对男孩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信