Effects of Shell Hash on Friction Angles of Surficial Seafloor Sediments near Oysters

IF 1.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Samuel T. Consolvo, N. Stark, B. Castellanos, C. Castro-Bolinaga, Steven Hall, G. Massey
{"title":"Effects of Shell Hash on Friction Angles of Surficial Seafloor Sediments near Oysters","authors":"Samuel T. Consolvo, N. Stark, B. Castellanos, C. Castro-Bolinaga, Steven Hall, G. Massey","doi":"10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oysters are hypothesized to affect the shear strength of nearby surficial seafloor sediment as fragments of oyster shells (shell hash) are typically more angular relative to sand particles alone, among other differences. Resistance to shearing is well characterized by the friction angle, which is estimated in this study from vacuum triaxial laboratory and portable free-fall penetrometer field tests. Friction angles of sediment with shell hash were higher relative to those of sediment without shell hash (via hydrochloric acid treatment) on average by about 19% (36.0°–30.2°, respectively). Triaxial confining pressures ranged between 2.1 and 49.0 kPa to simulate subtidal and intertidal aquatic conditions. Regularity (average of particle roundness and sphericity) values of sediment samples with shell hash were found to be less than those of samples without by about 6% (0.66 and 0.70, respectively), which indicates the particle shapes of the former are, overall, more angular and less spherical. Further study and methodology improvements are needed to decrease the approximate 9° friction angle discrepancy estimated from fieldand laboratory-based tests. Knowing oysters have the potential to increase sediment shearing resistance helps establish a pathway of how shellfish colonies may contribute to mitigating surficial erosion around coastal infrastructure. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000716. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":54367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Oysters are hypothesized to affect the shear strength of nearby surficial seafloor sediment as fragments of oyster shells (shell hash) are typically more angular relative to sand particles alone, among other differences. Resistance to shearing is well characterized by the friction angle, which is estimated in this study from vacuum triaxial laboratory and portable free-fall penetrometer field tests. Friction angles of sediment with shell hash were higher relative to those of sediment without shell hash (via hydrochloric acid treatment) on average by about 19% (36.0°–30.2°, respectively). Triaxial confining pressures ranged between 2.1 and 49.0 kPa to simulate subtidal and intertidal aquatic conditions. Regularity (average of particle roundness and sphericity) values of sediment samples with shell hash were found to be less than those of samples without by about 6% (0.66 and 0.70, respectively), which indicates the particle shapes of the former are, overall, more angular and less spherical. Further study and methodology improvements are needed to decrease the approximate 9° friction angle discrepancy estimated from fieldand laboratory-based tests. Knowing oysters have the potential to increase sediment shearing resistance helps establish a pathway of how shellfish colonies may contribute to mitigating surficial erosion around coastal infrastructure. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000716. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
贝壳哈希对牡蛎附近表层海底沉积物摩擦角的影响
假设牡蛎会影响附近表层海底沉积物的抗剪强度,因为牡蛎壳碎片(贝壳碎片)通常相对于单独的砂粒更具角度,还有其他差异。本研究通过真空三轴实验室和便携式自由落体透度计的现场试验估计了摩擦角,从而很好地表征了剪切阻力。有壳散列的沉积物的摩擦角比没有壳散列的沉淀物(通过盐酸处理)的摩擦角平均高出约19%(分别为36.0°–30.2°)。三轴围压范围在2.1和49.0kPa之间,以模拟潮下和潮间带的水生条件。研究发现,带有贝壳散列的沉积物样品的规则性(颗粒圆度和球形度的平均值)值比没有贝壳散列的样品低约6%(分别为0.66和0.70),这表明前者的颗粒形状总体上更具棱角,而球形更小。需要进一步的研究和方法改进,以减少现场和实验室测试估计的大约9°摩擦角差异。了解牡蛎有可能增加沉积物的抗剪切能力,有助于建立一条途径,了解贝类群落如何有助于减轻沿海基础设施周围的地表侵蚀。DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000716。这项工作是根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可证的条款提供的,https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering disseminates to the profession engineering and scientific advances made in the COPRI disciplines. The journal is a strong forum for civil engineering disciplines related to ocean, coastal and riverine waters as well as the interaction of these waters and the adjacent built and natural environments. This broad scope makes the Journal an ideal choice for the publication and dissemination of archival contributions dealing with important related topics. Topics include dredging, floods, sediment transport, tides, wind waves and storm surge, tsunamis, climate change, rising sea level, extreme weather events and other hazards that affect shorelines, waterways, estuaries, and ports and harbors, as well as efforts to mitigate the impact of such hazards. Of equal interest is the development and operation of offshore facilities and ocean resource utilization, such as renewable energy and ocean mining. Types of publications include original journal articles, comprehensive review articles, short technical notes, case studies of special interest to the readership, book reviews, and special issues on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信