Changing perspectives among pre-health undergraduates through a brief weight bias pedagogical intervention

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
N. Bolter, Daria Sosna, M. Arauzo, G. George
{"title":"Changing perspectives among pre-health undergraduates through a brief weight bias pedagogical intervention","authors":"N. Bolter, Daria Sosna, M. Arauzo, G. George","doi":"10.1177/00178969231159960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Weight stigma and bias are present in education, employment, and health care institutions, and have increased in recent years. College students in pre-health majors have been documented to hold weight biases, and interventions to mitigate these beliefs have had varying results. Objectives: This study’s purpose was to assess the impact of a pedagogical intervention regarding weight stigma outcomes among first-year students. Method: Three instructors of lower-division health and social science courses implemented a 3-module lecture series on weight stigma, the environmental sources of weight variability, and body appreciation. Participants (N = 81; 48 from intervention (INT) classrooms, 33 from comparison [COM] classrooms) completed an end-of-semester survey regarding their anti-fat biases, fat phobia, and body appreciation, and a subset (n = 13) participated in a semi-structured interview about their experiences. Results: Results revealed no outcome differences between the treatment versus comparison groups, although self-reported body mass index (BMI) was a significant covariate (p = .008). A significant correlation emerged between BMI and fear of fat scores for COM (r = .52, p < .01) but not for INT students (r = .28, p > .05), suggesting the intervention may have impacted how students form their anti-fat biases in relation to their BMI. Qualitative findings yielded five themes – connected course material with personal experiences; learned about weight stigma; shifted perspective on weight stigma; recognised application of weight stigma; material to future career; and valued learning about weight stigma – that provided insight into how the intervention positively affected students. Conclusion: Informed by the findings from this study, future interventions should take a more immersive pedagogical approach.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"361 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231159960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Weight stigma and bias are present in education, employment, and health care institutions, and have increased in recent years. College students in pre-health majors have been documented to hold weight biases, and interventions to mitigate these beliefs have had varying results. Objectives: This study’s purpose was to assess the impact of a pedagogical intervention regarding weight stigma outcomes among first-year students. Method: Three instructors of lower-division health and social science courses implemented a 3-module lecture series on weight stigma, the environmental sources of weight variability, and body appreciation. Participants (N = 81; 48 from intervention (INT) classrooms, 33 from comparison [COM] classrooms) completed an end-of-semester survey regarding their anti-fat biases, fat phobia, and body appreciation, and a subset (n = 13) participated in a semi-structured interview about their experiences. Results: Results revealed no outcome differences between the treatment versus comparison groups, although self-reported body mass index (BMI) was a significant covariate (p = .008). A significant correlation emerged between BMI and fear of fat scores for COM (r = .52, p < .01) but not for INT students (r = .28, p > .05), suggesting the intervention may have impacted how students form their anti-fat biases in relation to their BMI. Qualitative findings yielded five themes – connected course material with personal experiences; learned about weight stigma; shifted perspective on weight stigma; recognised application of weight stigma; material to future career; and valued learning about weight stigma – that provided insight into how the intervention positively affected students. Conclusion: Informed by the findings from this study, future interventions should take a more immersive pedagogical approach.
通过短暂的体重偏差教学干预改变健康前本科生的观点
背景:体重歧视和偏见存在于教育、就业和卫生保健机构中,并且近年来有所增加。据记载,健康预科专业的大学生有体重偏见,减轻这些偏见的干预措施产生了不同的结果。目的:本研究的目的是评估教学干预对一年级学生体重耻辱感结果的影响。方法:三名低年级健康与社会科学课程的教师实施了一套3单元的系列讲座,内容涉及体重耻辱感、体重变异的环境来源和身体欣赏。参与者(N = 81;来自干预班(INT)的48人,来自比较班(COM)的33人完成了一项关于他们的反肥胖偏见、肥胖恐惧症和身体欣赏的期末调查,其中一部分(n = 13)参加了关于他们经历的半结构化访谈。结果:结果显示治疗组与对照组之间没有结果差异,尽管自我报告的体重指数(BMI)是一个显著的协变量(p = 0.008)。COM学生的BMI和对脂肪的恐惧得分之间存在显著的相关性(r = 0.52, p < 0.01),而INT学生则没有(r = 0.28, p < 0.05),这表明干预可能影响了学生如何形成与BMI相关的反脂肪偏见。定性研究结果产生了五个主题——将课程材料与个人经历联系起来;了解了体重耻辱感;改变了对体重病耻感的看法;重量污名的公认应用;材料给未来的事业;并且重视了解体重歧视——这让我们了解了干预是如何对学生产生积极影响的。结论:根据本研究的发现,未来的干预措施应该采取更加沉浸式的教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信