TIPOLOGÍAS Y CARACTERIZACIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE CRÍA BOVINA DE LA PAMPA DEPRIMIDA

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRONOMY
C. Faverin, Claudio Machado
{"title":"TIPOLOGÍAS Y CARACTERIZACIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE CRÍA BOVINA DE LA PAMPA DEPRIMIDA","authors":"C. Faverin, Claudio Machado","doi":"10.4067/S0719-38902019005000101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identification and characterization of livestock systems help improve decision-making. In order to identify the typology of cow-calf systems from the Flooding Pampas, survey data of 115 farms were processed using 39 diagnostic variables. Data on farm structure, productivity indicators, forage resources, animal feeding practices, reproduction, animal health practices, and social information were analyzed. A cluster analysis was used to establish farm typologies. Four farm groups (G) were differentiated using cluster analysis: G1: Medium-scale technified farmer; G2: Mediumscale traditional farmer; G3: Large-scale technified local enterprise; and G4: Large-scale technified Chilean J. Agric. Anim. Sci., ex Agro-Ciencia (2019) 35(1): 4 3-13. enterprise. Overall mean stocking rate was 0.72 cow unit ha-1. The technified systems had better productivity indicators than the traditional systems. The main fodder resource was grasslands, accounting for 98% and 67-72% of traditional (98%) and technified (67-72%) systems, respectively. The diet in technified systems also included cultivated pastures (9-19%), and winter (8.2-8.9%) and summer fodder crops (4.7-5.5%). The technified systems mainly differed in terms of scale (P < 0.05) (499 to 1627 ha), legal ownership, farmer’s or farmer’s family’s place of residence (farm distance depending on G), recruitment of temporary staff (75 to > 92%), use and frequency of agricultural consultancy, adoption of different animal management practices, among others. This livestock farm typology may help agricultural institutions design specific technology transfer proposals.","PeriodicalId":42485,"journal":{"name":"Chilean Journal of Agricultural & Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chilean Journal of Agricultural & Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-38902019005000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Identification and characterization of livestock systems help improve decision-making. In order to identify the typology of cow-calf systems from the Flooding Pampas, survey data of 115 farms were processed using 39 diagnostic variables. Data on farm structure, productivity indicators, forage resources, animal feeding practices, reproduction, animal health practices, and social information were analyzed. A cluster analysis was used to establish farm typologies. Four farm groups (G) were differentiated using cluster analysis: G1: Medium-scale technified farmer; G2: Mediumscale traditional farmer; G3: Large-scale technified local enterprise; and G4: Large-scale technified Chilean J. Agric. Anim. Sci., ex Agro-Ciencia (2019) 35(1): 4 3-13. enterprise. Overall mean stocking rate was 0.72 cow unit ha-1. The technified systems had better productivity indicators than the traditional systems. The main fodder resource was grasslands, accounting for 98% and 67-72% of traditional (98%) and technified (67-72%) systems, respectively. The diet in technified systems also included cultivated pastures (9-19%), and winter (8.2-8.9%) and summer fodder crops (4.7-5.5%). The technified systems mainly differed in terms of scale (P < 0.05) (499 to 1627 ha), legal ownership, farmer’s or farmer’s family’s place of residence (farm distance depending on G), recruitment of temporary staff (75 to > 92%), use and frequency of agricultural consultancy, adoption of different animal management practices, among others. This livestock farm typology may help agricultural institutions design specific technology transfer proposals.
草原洼地牛饲养系统的类型与特征
牲畜系统的识别和表征有助于改进决策。为了确定洪水潘帕斯的小牛系统类型,使用39个诊断变量对115个农场的调查数据进行了处理。分析了农场结构、生产力指标、饲料资源、动物饲养实践、繁殖、动物健康实践和社会信息方面的数据。使用聚类分析来建立农场类型。采用聚类分析法对4个农户群体(G)进行了区分:G1:中等规模技术农户;G2:中等规模的传统农民;G3:当地大型技术企业;G4:大规模技术化的智利J.Agric。阿尼姆。Sci。,前Agro Ciencia(2019)35(1):4 3-13。企业总体平均放养率为0.72牛单位ha-1。技术化的系统比传统系统具有更好的生产力指标。主要饲料资源为草地,分别占传统系统(98%)和技术系统(67-72%)的98%和67-72%。技术化系统中的饮食还包括栽培牧场(9-19%)、冬季(8.2-8.9%)和夏季饲料作物(4.7-5.5%)。技术化系统主要在规模(P<0.05)(499-1627公顷)、合法所有权、农民或农民家庭的居住地(农场距离取决于G)、临时员工的招聘(75%->92%),农业咨询的使用和频率,采用不同的动物管理实践等。这种畜牧场类型可能有助于农业机构设计具体的技术转让提案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Revista Chile de Agricultura y Ciencias Veterinarias es una revista de acceso abierto (open access), que significa que su contenido está disponible en forma gratuita para los usuarios y sus instituciones. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o establecer una conexión a los artículos sin necesidad de pedir autorización previa al editor o a los autores. Esto es de acuerdo con la definición de Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). Los artículos se publican bajo una licencia de Creative Commons reconocimiento No Comercial 4.0 Internacional. Copyright: Se autoriza la reproducción y cita de los artículos publicados en Chilean Journal of Agricultural & Animal Sciences (ex Agro-Ciencia), siempre que se indique el nombre del autor(es), año, volumen, número y páginas. Las opiniones y afirmaciones expuestas en los trabajos representan exclusivamente los puntos de vista de los autores. La mención de productos o marcas comerciales en la revista no implica una recomendación por parte de la Universidad de Concepción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信