Structural Behavior of Hollow Beam Reinforced with Different types of GFRP stirrups

Q3 Environmental Science
Ammar K. Badawi, Yasser I. O. Yahia, A. I. Abdulla
{"title":"Structural Behavior of Hollow Beam Reinforced with Different types of GFRP stirrups","authors":"Ammar K. Badawi, Yasser I. O. Yahia, A. I. Abdulla","doi":"10.25130/tjes.30.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structure could be impacted by concrete's steel reinforcement corroding. When exceptional corrosion resistance capabilities are required, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements offer a practical choice for constructions exposed to hostile environments. However, only a small number of the building's most important structural components are currently permitted to use FRP bars as interior concrete reinforcement, leaving the rest of the building unprotected. This is due to the lack of available curved or shaped reinforcing FRP pieces, which have subpar structural performance. Eighteen concrete beams with dimensions (1200×225×150) mm were divided into three groups and each group had five beams with three References and five different types of stirrups in each group and tested them up to failure. The first group included longitudinal reinforcing steel bars 6Ø10mm, the second group longitudinal reinforcing GFRP bars 6Ø10mm, and the third group longitudinal reinforced with hybrid (3steel+ 3GFRP) bars 6Ø10mm. All beams are self-compacting concrete with a longitudinal hollow with dimensions (50×100) mm. The results showed that the ultimate load of a hollow beam reinforced with steel reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with steel (reference 1) by (15%) and a hollow beam reinforcing with GFRP reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with GFRP (reference 2) by (5%), and a hollow beam hybrid reinforced with (Steel+ GFRP) reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with GFRP (reference 3) by (4%).","PeriodicalId":30589,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The structure could be impacted by concrete's steel reinforcement corroding. When exceptional corrosion resistance capabilities are required, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements offer a practical choice for constructions exposed to hostile environments. However, only a small number of the building's most important structural components are currently permitted to use FRP bars as interior concrete reinforcement, leaving the rest of the building unprotected. This is due to the lack of available curved or shaped reinforcing FRP pieces, which have subpar structural performance. Eighteen concrete beams with dimensions (1200×225×150) mm were divided into three groups and each group had five beams with three References and five different types of stirrups in each group and tested them up to failure. The first group included longitudinal reinforcing steel bars 6Ø10mm, the second group longitudinal reinforcing GFRP bars 6Ø10mm, and the third group longitudinal reinforced with hybrid (3steel+ 3GFRP) bars 6Ø10mm. All beams are self-compacting concrete with a longitudinal hollow with dimensions (50×100) mm. The results showed that the ultimate load of a hollow beam reinforced with steel reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with steel (reference 1) by (15%) and a hollow beam reinforcing with GFRP reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with GFRP (reference 2) by (5%), and a hollow beam hybrid reinforced with (Steel+ GFRP) reinforcement is less than a solid beam reinforced with GFRP (reference 3) by (4%).
不同类型GFRP筋配筋空心梁的结构性能
混凝土钢筋锈蚀会对结构产生冲击。当需要特殊的耐腐蚀能力时,纤维增强聚合物(FRP)增强材料为暴露在恶劣环境中的建筑提供了一个实用的选择。然而,目前只有少数建筑物最重要的结构部件被允许使用FRP筋作为内部混凝土加固,而建筑物的其余部分则不受保护。这是由于缺乏可用的弯曲或形状增强玻璃钢片,具有低于标准的结构性能。18根尺寸(1200×225×150) mm的混凝土梁被分成三组,每组有5根梁,每组有3个参考文献和5种不同类型的马镫,并对它们进行了测试直到失效。第一组为纵向配筋6Ø10mm,第二组为纵向配筋GFRP筋6Ø10mm,第三组为纵向配筋(3钢+ 3GFRP)筋6Ø10mm。所有梁均为纵向空心的自密实混凝土,尺寸为50×100) mm。结果表明,钢筋加固的空心梁的极限荷载比钢筋加固的实心梁(文献1)小15%,GFRP加固的空心梁比GFRP加固的实心梁(文献2)小5%;(钢+玻璃钢)配筋的空心梁比玻璃钢(文献3)配筋的实心梁小(4%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信