Narrative inquiry on case studies of crisis in dementia

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
A. Bosco, J. Schneider, Donna Maria Coleston-Shields, M. Orrell
{"title":"Narrative inquiry on case studies of crisis in dementia","authors":"A. Bosco, J. Schneider, Donna Maria Coleston-Shields, M. Orrell","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-02-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore the coping styles that can be inferred from the discourse of dyads with dementia, and how these appear to impact on care management.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis was a case study approach. Participants were recruited from two teams managing crisis in dementia in the UK. The authors conducted multiple qualitative interviews with people with dementia and their family carers over the course of one month. The analysis was first performed through thematic analysis. Data were further analysed through narrative inquiry to create a story line, or play in our case, for our findings.\n\n\nFindings\nFive dyads were interviewed and a total of 16 interviews were conducted. Three dyads were husband–wife and two were daughter–mother relationships. The mean age was 67.4 years for carers and 79.8 years for people with dementia. In these cases, the carer assumed responsibility for managing the episode and was more likely to seek formal help if a pre-existing plan was in place. Otherwise, when a crisis arose, dyads preferred to avoid involving professionals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nPsychosocial interventions should aim to identify and replace unhelpful strategies used by dyads to manage crisis episodes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study using qualitative interviews of dyads to inquire into their experience of mental health crisis.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/qaoa-02-2020-0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-02-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the coping styles that can be inferred from the discourse of dyads with dementia, and how these appear to impact on care management. Design/methodology/approach This was a case study approach. Participants were recruited from two teams managing crisis in dementia in the UK. The authors conducted multiple qualitative interviews with people with dementia and their family carers over the course of one month. The analysis was first performed through thematic analysis. Data were further analysed through narrative inquiry to create a story line, or play in our case, for our findings. Findings Five dyads were interviewed and a total of 16 interviews were conducted. Three dyads were husband–wife and two were daughter–mother relationships. The mean age was 67.4 years for carers and 79.8 years for people with dementia. In these cases, the carer assumed responsibility for managing the episode and was more likely to seek formal help if a pre-existing plan was in place. Otherwise, when a crisis arose, dyads preferred to avoid involving professionals. Practical implications Psychosocial interventions should aim to identify and replace unhelpful strategies used by dyads to manage crisis episodes. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study using qualitative interviews of dyads to inquire into their experience of mental health crisis.
痴呆危机案例研究的叙事探究
目的本研究旨在探索从痴呆症二人组的话语中可以推断出的应对方式,以及这些应对方式对护理管理的影响。设计/方法论/方法这是一种案例研究方法。参与者来自英国管理痴呆症危机的两个团队。作者在一个月的时间里对痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员进行了多次定性采访。该分析首先通过专题分析进行。通过叙述性调查对数据进行了进一步分析,为我们的发现创造了一条故事线,或者在我们的案例中发挥作用。调查结果对五名二人组进行了访谈,共进行了16次访谈。三对是夫妻关系,两对是女儿关系。护理人员的平均年龄为67.4岁,痴呆症患者为79.8岁。在这些情况下,护理人员承担了管理事件的责任,如果已有计划,则更有可能寻求正式帮助。否则,当危机发生时,二人组倾向于避免涉及专业人士。实际含义心理社会干预应旨在识别和取代二人组在管理危机事件时使用的无益策略。独创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项使用定性访谈对二人组进行心理健康危机体验调查的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信