Relationship Rich Education: How Human Connections Drive Success in College

Laura Harrison
{"title":"Relationship Rich Education: How Human Connections Drive Success in College","authors":"Laura Harrison","doi":"10.1080/2194587x.2021.1939724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I came across this book, my first thought was that the premise was a bit obvious. Relationships are important to student success. One would be hard pressed to find a less controversial position in higher education. The authors preempt this argument by acknowledging it, then correctly pointing out that higher education leaders often fail to prioritize mentoring and other forms of relationship-rich education in their allocation of human and financial resources. Felton and Lambert devote the bulk of this work to highlighting institutional programs, policies, and practices that prioritize this human element. They discuss curricular and cocurricular initiatives in an integrated way, highlighting the importance of benefits offered by both kinds of engagement. A cocurricular example the authors discuss is California State University-Dominguez Hills’s Male Success Initiative, a mentoring program that takes a holistic approach to developing students’ academic and personal talents. For a book dedicated to what can be perceived as a soft topic, the authors take a refreshingly practical approach. They communicate in detail why relationships matter, following the aforementioned program highlight with the results of a 2014 Gallup-Purdue study of 30,000 college graduates showing a positive relationship between mentorship and workplace engagement (p. 25). The authors also provide several examples of curricular policies and practices that foster connection and corresponding evidence as to why they are worth the investment. They highlight Elon University’s curriculum re-structuring, which awarded four credit hours for most classes in order to allow faculty to teach fewer courses with more depth and student centeredness. Felton and Lambert also discussed Florida International University’s integration of learning assistants into large courses to provide more focused attention and personalized instruction. While some might balk at the price, the authors argue, “Yes, this kind of education may have additional costs, but the costs pale in comparison to higher attrition rates, greater likelihood of student loan default, and the huge social costs of students not reaching their full potential” (p. 151). By Peter Felten and Leo M. Lambert, 2020. Johns Hopkins University Press, 187 pages, ISBN 9781421439360, Hardback, $39.95","PeriodicalId":89967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of college and character","volume":"22 1","pages":"266 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of college and character","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587x.2021.1939724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

When I came across this book, my first thought was that the premise was a bit obvious. Relationships are important to student success. One would be hard pressed to find a less controversial position in higher education. The authors preempt this argument by acknowledging it, then correctly pointing out that higher education leaders often fail to prioritize mentoring and other forms of relationship-rich education in their allocation of human and financial resources. Felton and Lambert devote the bulk of this work to highlighting institutional programs, policies, and practices that prioritize this human element. They discuss curricular and cocurricular initiatives in an integrated way, highlighting the importance of benefits offered by both kinds of engagement. A cocurricular example the authors discuss is California State University-Dominguez Hills’s Male Success Initiative, a mentoring program that takes a holistic approach to developing students’ academic and personal talents. For a book dedicated to what can be perceived as a soft topic, the authors take a refreshingly practical approach. They communicate in detail why relationships matter, following the aforementioned program highlight with the results of a 2014 Gallup-Purdue study of 30,000 college graduates showing a positive relationship between mentorship and workplace engagement (p. 25). The authors also provide several examples of curricular policies and practices that foster connection and corresponding evidence as to why they are worth the investment. They highlight Elon University’s curriculum re-structuring, which awarded four credit hours for most classes in order to allow faculty to teach fewer courses with more depth and student centeredness. Felton and Lambert also discussed Florida International University’s integration of learning assistants into large courses to provide more focused attention and personalized instruction. While some might balk at the price, the authors argue, “Yes, this kind of education may have additional costs, but the costs pale in comparison to higher attrition rates, greater likelihood of student loan default, and the huge social costs of students not reaching their full potential” (p. 151). By Peter Felten and Leo M. Lambert, 2020. Johns Hopkins University Press, 187 pages, ISBN 9781421439360, Hardback, $39.95
关系丰富的教育:人际关系如何推动大学成功
当我看到这本书时,我的第一个想法是前提有点明显。人际关系对学生的成功很重要。人们很难在高等教育中找到一个争议较小的职位。作者首先承认了这一论点,然后正确地指出,高等教育领导者在分配人力和财力资源时,往往没有优先考虑辅导和其他形式的关系丰富的教育。Felton和Lambert将这项工作的大部分用于强调优先考虑这一人类因素的机构计划、政策和实践。他们以综合的方式讨论课程和课外活动,强调了这两种参与所带来的好处的重要性。作者讨论的一个共同案例是加州州立大学多明格斯山分校的男性成功倡议,这是一个采用整体方法培养学生学术和个人才能的辅导项目。对于一本专注于软主题的书,作者们采取了一种令人耳目一新的实用方法。2014年,盖洛普-普渡大学对30000名大学毕业生进行了一项研究,结果显示导师制与工作场所参与度之间存在积极关系(第25页)。作者还提供了几个促进联系的课程政策和实践的例子,以及为什么值得投资的相应证据。他们强调了埃隆大学的课程重组,该校为大多数课程提供了四个学分,以使教师能够教授更少的课程,更深入,以学生为中心。Felton和Lambert还讨论了佛罗里达国际大学将学习助理整合到大型课程中,以提供更集中的注意力和个性化的教学。虽然有些人可能会对价格望而却步,但作者认为,“是的,这种教育可能会有额外的成本,但与更高的自然减员率、更大的学生贷款违约可能性以及学生未能充分发挥潜力的巨大社会成本相比,这些成本微不足道”(第151页)。彼得·费尔滕和利奥·M·兰伯特,2020年。约翰斯·霍普金斯大学出版社,187页,ISBN 9781421439360,精装本,39.95美元
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书