Struktury uzasadniania. Część II. Fundacjonizm

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Filozofia Nauki Pub Date : 2018-06-30 DOI:10.14394/filnau.2018.0012

J. Ziobrowski

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is the second part of a series of articles concerning the structure of justification. The author discusses foundationalism — the most often adopted position on this issue. He distinguishes different kinds of this position and points out the main objections against it. General considerations concerning foundationalism are illustrated by solutions included in the theories of “the late” Laurence BonJour and Robert Audi.

查看原文本刊更多论文

本文是正当性结构系列文章的第二部分。作者讨论了在这个问题上最常用的立场——基础主义。他区分了这种观点的不同种类，并指出了反对这种观点的主要理由。“已故的”劳伦斯·邦约尔和罗伯特·奥迪的理论中包含的解决方案说明了关于基础主义的一般考虑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Filozofia Nauki PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Filozofia Nauki (The Philosophy of Science) is a double-blind peer-reviewed academic quarterly published by the Institute of Philosophy, University of Warsaw. It publishes articles, notes, and reviews covering the whole range of analytic philosophy, including among others: epistemology, ontology, general philosophy of science, philosophy of physics, philosophy of biology, philosophy of mathematics, philosophical logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of action, philosophy of mind, cognitive sciences, experimental philosophy. We invite papers not only from professional philosophers but also from specialists in different areas, interested in generalizing their scientific experiences towards more foundational issues.