Assessment of Burnout Syndrome and Physical Activity of the University Teachers – A cross-sectional Observational Study

Qazi Noor Ul Wahab, Z. Din, M. Jahanzeb, Saleem Ullah, M. Abbas
{"title":"Assessment of Burnout Syndrome and Physical Activity of the University Teachers – A cross-sectional Observational Study","authors":"Qazi Noor Ul Wahab, Z. Din, M. Jahanzeb, Saleem Ullah, M. Abbas","doi":"10.29052/2412-3188.v9.i1.2022.17-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Burnout and physical activity (PA) are two critical determinants of health. The burnout and PA of the university teachers in Pakistan are not well, established. The main objective of the present study is to determine the prevalence of burnout syndrome and the level of physical activity in university teachers. \nMethodology: The sample of university teachers (n=505) was drawn from 14 public/private universities in Peshawar using a partly convenient, non-probabilistic method based on an exhaustive and up-to-date database of all universities in Peshawar. Data were collected on these parameters: socio-demographics, anthropometrics (body weight, height, and body mass index: BMI), Burnout using Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-ES), and PA level. The global Physical Activity Questionnaire developed by WHO (GPAQ-WHO) was used.   \nResults: The sample consisted predominantly of males (78%) with a mean (SD) age of 37.5 ± 7.9 (Range: 28 – 60). The results demonstrated that 19% of university teachers suffered from burnout syndrome, with most of those with job experience <10 years. The mean PA for all the respondents was 955.1 MET minutes/week, with significant differences in PA levels of male and female teachers from public vs. private universities (p, for all trends < 0.05). The proportion of physically active university teachers was 63.6% (95%CI 56.6 to 68.2), with a higher proportion of university teachers without Burnout Syndrome being physically active than those with Burnout Syndrome (73.5% (95%CI 68.1 to 79.3) vs. 21.6% (95%CI 16.5 to 24.6). Only a small number of university teachers could achieve the recommended levels of PA with differences between genders and university types. \nConclusion: Work-related burnout is seen in teachers with poor physical activity, and females are mostly affected. Public sector universities showed a greater burnout rate. The public sector needs to revitalize the staff and train them to manage their workload efficiently.","PeriodicalId":34185,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Psychophysiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29052/2412-3188.v9.i1.2022.17-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout and physical activity (PA) are two critical determinants of health. The burnout and PA of the university teachers in Pakistan are not well, established. The main objective of the present study is to determine the prevalence of burnout syndrome and the level of physical activity in university teachers. Methodology: The sample of university teachers (n=505) was drawn from 14 public/private universities in Peshawar using a partly convenient, non-probabilistic method based on an exhaustive and up-to-date database of all universities in Peshawar. Data were collected on these parameters: socio-demographics, anthropometrics (body weight, height, and body mass index: BMI), Burnout using Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-ES), and PA level. The global Physical Activity Questionnaire developed by WHO (GPAQ-WHO) was used.   Results: The sample consisted predominantly of males (78%) with a mean (SD) age of 37.5 ± 7.9 (Range: 28 – 60). The results demonstrated that 19% of university teachers suffered from burnout syndrome, with most of those with job experience <10 years. The mean PA for all the respondents was 955.1 MET minutes/week, with significant differences in PA levels of male and female teachers from public vs. private universities (p, for all trends < 0.05). The proportion of physically active university teachers was 63.6% (95%CI 56.6 to 68.2), with a higher proportion of university teachers without Burnout Syndrome being physically active than those with Burnout Syndrome (73.5% (95%CI 68.1 to 79.3) vs. 21.6% (95%CI 16.5 to 24.6). Only a small number of university teachers could achieve the recommended levels of PA with differences between genders and university types. Conclusion: Work-related burnout is seen in teachers with poor physical activity, and females are mostly affected. Public sector universities showed a greater burnout rate. The public sector needs to revitalize the staff and train them to manage their workload efficiently.
高校教师倦怠综合征和体育活动的评估——一项横断面观察研究
背景:倦怠和体育活动是健康的两个关键决定因素。巴基斯坦大学教师的倦怠和PA状况并不明显。本研究的主要目的是确定大学教师职业倦怠综合征的患病率和体育活动水平。方法:大学教师样本(n=505)来自白沙瓦的14所公立/私立大学,采用部分方便的非概率方法,基于白沙瓦所有大学的详尽和最新数据库。收集了以下参数的数据:社会人口统计、人体测量(体重、身高和体重指数:BMI)、使用Maslach倦怠量表(MBI-ES)的倦怠和PA水平。采用世界卫生组织编制的全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ-WHO)。结果:样本主要由男性(78%)组成,平均(SD)年龄为37.5±7.9(范围:28-60)。结果表明,19%的大学教师患有倦怠综合征,其中大多数教师的工作经验<10年。所有受访者的平均PA为955.1 MET分钟/周,公立大学和私立大学的男女教师的PA水平存在显著差异(p,所有趋势均<0.05)。体育活动的大学教师比例为63.6%(95%CI 56.6至68.2),没有倦怠综合症的大学教师体育活动的比例高于有倦怠综合症的教师(73.5%(95%CI 68.1至79.3)和21.6%(95%CI 16.5至24.6)。只有少数大学教师能够达到推荐的PA水平,但性别和大学类型之间存在差异。结论:体育活动能力差的教师存在与工作相关的倦怠,女性受影响最大。公立大学的倦怠率更高。公共部门需要振兴工作人员,培训他们有效地管理工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信