Framing sustainability in public procurement by typologizing sustainability indicators – the case of Switzerland

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Sebastian Knebel, Peter Seele
{"title":"Framing sustainability in public procurement by typologizing sustainability indicators – the case of Switzerland","authors":"Sebastian Knebel, Peter Seele","doi":"10.1108/JOPP-09-2020-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSustainable public procurement (SPP) lacks common means for its operationalization within legislative latitudes. Through the translation of sustainability indicators (SIs) from CSR and corporate sustainability reporting into the needs of SPP, this paper aims to support the framing process of sustainability in public procurement. This paper does so along with the case of Switzerland.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper performs a typological analysis of well-established SIs from CSR reporting to propose a criteria framework for SPP. Second, this paper tests the framework’s usability and feasibility with an expert online survey conducted in the Swiss SPP landscape.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper proposes 10 generic criteria to frame the operationalization of SPP. Furthermore, public procurement experts from Switzerland evaluate the SPP framework as useful and feasible.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA limitation of the study can be seen in its deductive approach. Thus, it rather complements recent inductive approaches of SPP type and frame developments than replacing them. Future studies can further refine the understanding and operationalization of sustainability in public procurement.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe generic SPP criteria framework provides a common ground for the operationalization of SPP building on existing sustainability performance measurement knowledge and a frame to operationalize sustainability measurements for public tender processes.\n\n\nSocial implications\nImplementing sustainability in public procurement potentially changes market behaviors globally toward social equality and minimization of climate change impacts. This research aims to support the SPP implementation process.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best knowledge, this is the first attempt to directly translate established SIs from sustainability reporting into public procurement to frame SPP and to use existing sustainability measurement knowledge for its operationalization and harmonization.\n","PeriodicalId":45136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Procurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2020-0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Sustainable public procurement (SPP) lacks common means for its operationalization within legislative latitudes. Through the translation of sustainability indicators (SIs) from CSR and corporate sustainability reporting into the needs of SPP, this paper aims to support the framing process of sustainability in public procurement. This paper does so along with the case of Switzerland. Design/methodology/approach This paper performs a typological analysis of well-established SIs from CSR reporting to propose a criteria framework for SPP. Second, this paper tests the framework’s usability and feasibility with an expert online survey conducted in the Swiss SPP landscape. Findings This paper proposes 10 generic criteria to frame the operationalization of SPP. Furthermore, public procurement experts from Switzerland evaluate the SPP framework as useful and feasible. Research limitations/implications A limitation of the study can be seen in its deductive approach. Thus, it rather complements recent inductive approaches of SPP type and frame developments than replacing them. Future studies can further refine the understanding and operationalization of sustainability in public procurement. Practical implications The generic SPP criteria framework provides a common ground for the operationalization of SPP building on existing sustainability performance measurement knowledge and a frame to operationalize sustainability measurements for public tender processes. Social implications Implementing sustainability in public procurement potentially changes market behaviors globally toward social equality and minimization of climate change impacts. This research aims to support the SPP implementation process. Originality/value To the best knowledge, this is the first attempt to directly translate established SIs from sustainability reporting into public procurement to frame SPP and to use existing sustainability measurement knowledge for its operationalization and harmonization.
通过可持续性指标的类型学来构建公共采购中的可持续性——以瑞士为例
目的可持续公共采购缺乏在立法范围内运作的共同手段。通过将企业社会责任和企业可持续性报告中的可持续性指标转化为SPP的需求,本文旨在支持公共采购中可持续性的制定过程。本文结合瑞士的案例进行了分析。设计/方法/方法本文对企业社会责任报告中的既定社会责任进行了类型学分析,以提出SPP的标准框架。其次,本文通过在瑞士SPP领域进行的专家在线调查来测试该框架的可用性和可行性。本文提出了10个通用标准来构建SPP的运作框架。此外,来自瑞士的公共采购专家认为SPP框架是有用和可行的。研究局限性/含义研究的局限性可以从其演绎方法中看出。因此,它补充了最近SPP类型和框架开发的归纳方法,而不是取代它们。未来的研究可以进一步完善对公共采购可持续性的理解和操作。实际含义通用可持续性采购标准框架为在现有可持续性绩效衡量知识的基础上实施可持续性采购提供了共同基础,并为实施公共招标过程的可持续性衡量提供了框架。社会影响在公共采购中实施可持续性可能会改变全球市场行为,实现社会平等并将气候变化影响降至最低。本研究旨在支持SPP的实施过程。独创性/价值据我们所知,这是第一次尝试将既定的可持续性指标从可持续性报告直接转化为公共采购,以制定可持续性目标,并利用现有的可持续性衡量知识进行操作和协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Procurement
Journal of Public Procurement PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) seeks to further the understanding of public procurement. JOPP publishes original, high-quality research that explores the theories and practices of public procurement. The journal ensures that high-quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase of goods, services and works by public organizations at a local, regional, national and international level. JOPP is multi-disciplinary, with a broad approach towards methods and styles of research as well as the level of issues addressed. The Journal welcomes the submission of papers from researchers internationally. The journal welcomes research papers, narrative essays, exemplar cases, forums, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信