{"title":"Impact of Stress-Coping Strategies on Personnel’s Mental Health during Naval Dispatch of the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) Destroyer","authors":"Tetsufumi Suda, Atsuko Takizawa, Kazumi Hatano, Takahide Kanatake, Kazuhiro Fujino","doi":"10.1080/21635781.2021.2019629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Predicting mental health problems is an important military concern as such problems have a negative impact on continuity of operations, especially at sea. One component of resilience, generally a strong predictor of mental health, is coping strategies which are more specific, measurable and easier to discuss than resilience. To examine whether such strategies would have a positive impact on mental health while at sea, we collected the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) for 134 of 199 crew members dispatched overseas for four months at the beginning (Time 1; T1) and the end of the dispatch (Time 2; T2). Stress-coping strategies were assessed using the Way of Coping Checklist at T1. The relationships between demographic factors, coping strategies, and GHQ-30 scores at T1 survey were examined. Subsequently, using factors associated with the differences in GHQ-30 scores between T1 and T2 (ΔGHQ-30), we created a multivariate model to identify predictor of ΔGHQ-30. In T1 survey, no demographic features but five stress-coping strategies were associated with GHQ-30 scores. In the multivariate model, positive cognitive coping was the only predictor of ΔGHQ-30. Assessing stress-coping strategies could predict individual’s resilience to occupational stress at sea, and teaching positive cognitive coping would improving their resilience.","PeriodicalId":37012,"journal":{"name":"Military Behavioral Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"338 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2021.2019629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Predicting mental health problems is an important military concern as such problems have a negative impact on continuity of operations, especially at sea. One component of resilience, generally a strong predictor of mental health, is coping strategies which are more specific, measurable and easier to discuss than resilience. To examine whether such strategies would have a positive impact on mental health while at sea, we collected the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) for 134 of 199 crew members dispatched overseas for four months at the beginning (Time 1; T1) and the end of the dispatch (Time 2; T2). Stress-coping strategies were assessed using the Way of Coping Checklist at T1. The relationships between demographic factors, coping strategies, and GHQ-30 scores at T1 survey were examined. Subsequently, using factors associated with the differences in GHQ-30 scores between T1 and T2 (ΔGHQ-30), we created a multivariate model to identify predictor of ΔGHQ-30. In T1 survey, no demographic features but five stress-coping strategies were associated with GHQ-30 scores. In the multivariate model, positive cognitive coping was the only predictor of ΔGHQ-30. Assessing stress-coping strategies could predict individual’s resilience to occupational stress at sea, and teaching positive cognitive coping would improving their resilience.