Observational Study of Dynamic Ventilation Parameters during Xenon Anesthesia

Bazin Je
{"title":"Observational Study of Dynamic Ventilation Parameters during Xenon Anesthesia","authors":"Bazin Je","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to observe dynamic pressure and flow measurements during the breathing cycle with different concentrations of xenon in patients without pulmonary disease to provide a better understanding of the mechanical-physiological effects of gas mixtures for anesthesia and other potential applications. Ventilation and respiratory data monitoring of flow rate, pressure at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit, inhaled volume, and concentration of oxygen, xenon, and carbon dioxide for three concentrations of xenon (0, 30, and 60%) were recorded on the anesthetic ventilator station and downloaded to a portable computer. Main Findings: The overall effects of gas concentration are compared in the superimposed flow and pressure curves recorded from the ventilator. Airway resistance increases with xenon concentration for both inspiration (p=0.0028) and expiration (p=0.0007) as expected. The compliance increased with increasing xenon concentration, but only to statistical significance between 100% oxygen and 60% xenon (p=0.0344). The percentage of pressure drop due to the breathing circuit were about 70% for all the groups (no differences statistically, p=0.8161). Conclusions: The results show that the dominant source of the pressure loss is from the breathing circuit compared to the respiratory tract in patients without respiratory disease during inspiration.","PeriodicalId":92989,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJANESTHESIAANDANALGESIA.2021.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to observe dynamic pressure and flow measurements during the breathing cycle with different concentrations of xenon in patients without pulmonary disease to provide a better understanding of the mechanical-physiological effects of gas mixtures for anesthesia and other potential applications. Ventilation and respiratory data monitoring of flow rate, pressure at the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit, inhaled volume, and concentration of oxygen, xenon, and carbon dioxide for three concentrations of xenon (0, 30, and 60%) were recorded on the anesthetic ventilator station and downloaded to a portable computer. Main Findings: The overall effects of gas concentration are compared in the superimposed flow and pressure curves recorded from the ventilator. Airway resistance increases with xenon concentration for both inspiration (p=0.0028) and expiration (p=0.0007) as expected. The compliance increased with increasing xenon concentration, but only to statistical significance between 100% oxygen and 60% xenon (p=0.0344). The percentage of pressure drop due to the breathing circuit were about 70% for all the groups (no differences statistically, p=0.8161). Conclusions: The results show that the dominant source of the pressure loss is from the breathing circuit compared to the respiratory tract in patients without respiratory disease during inspiration.
氙气麻醉中动态通气参数的观察研究
背景:本研究的目的是观察无肺部疾病患者呼吸周期中不同浓度氙气的动态压力和流量测量,以更好地了解混合气体在麻醉和其他潜在应用中的机械生理效应。在麻醉呼吸机上记录三种氙气浓度(0、30、60%)下的流量、呼吸机回路y段压力、吸入量和氧、氙、二氧化碳浓度的通气和呼吸数据监测,并下载到便携式计算机上。主要发现:在呼吸机记录的叠加流量和压力曲线中比较了气体浓度的总体影响。气道阻力随吸气(p=0.0028)和呼气(p=0.0007)浓度的增加而增加。顺应性随氙浓度的增加而增加,但仅在100%氧和60%氙之间有统计学意义(p=0.0344)。各组呼吸回路引起的压降比例均在70%左右(p=0.8161,差异无统计学意义)。结论:非呼吸系统疾病患者吸气时压力损失的主要来源是呼吸回路,而非呼吸道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信