Radiotherapy toxicity prediction using knowledge-constrained generalized linear model.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jiuyun Hu, Mirek Fatyga, Wei Liu, Steven E Schild, William W Wong, Sujay A Vora, Jing Li
{"title":"Radiotherapy toxicity prediction using knowledge-constrained generalized linear model.","authors":"Jiuyun Hu, Mirek Fatyga, Wei Liu, Steven E Schild, William W Wong, Sujay A Vora, Jing Li","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2023.2227199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation therapy (RT) is a frontline approach to treating cancer. While the target of radiation dose delivery is the tumor, there is an inevitable spill of dose to nearby normal organs causing complications. This phenomenon is known as radiotherapy toxicity. To predict the outcome of the toxicity, statistical models can be built based on dosimetric variables received by the normal organ at risk (OAR), known as Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models. To tackle the challenge of the high dimensionality of dosimetric variables and limited clinical sample sizes, statistical models with variable selection techniques are viable choices. However, existing variable selection techniques are data-driven and do not integrate medical domain knowledge into the model formulation. We propose a knowledge-constrained generalized linear model (KC-GLM). KC-GLM includes a new mathematical formulation to translate three pieces of domain knowledge into non-negativity, monotonicity, and adjacent similarity constraints on the model coefficients. We further propose an equivalent transformation of the KC-GLM formulation, which makes it possible to solve the model coefficients using existing optimization solvers. Furthermore, we compare KC-GLM and several well-known variable selection techniques <i>via</i> a simulation study and on two real datasets of prostate cancer and lung cancer, respectively. These experiments show that KC-GLM selects variables with better interpretability, avoids producing counter-intuitive and misleading results, and has better prediction accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"130-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2023.2227199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a frontline approach to treating cancer. While the target of radiation dose delivery is the tumor, there is an inevitable spill of dose to nearby normal organs causing complications. This phenomenon is known as radiotherapy toxicity. To predict the outcome of the toxicity, statistical models can be built based on dosimetric variables received by the normal organ at risk (OAR), known as Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models. To tackle the challenge of the high dimensionality of dosimetric variables and limited clinical sample sizes, statistical models with variable selection techniques are viable choices. However, existing variable selection techniques are data-driven and do not integrate medical domain knowledge into the model formulation. We propose a knowledge-constrained generalized linear model (KC-GLM). KC-GLM includes a new mathematical formulation to translate three pieces of domain knowledge into non-negativity, monotonicity, and adjacent similarity constraints on the model coefficients. We further propose an equivalent transformation of the KC-GLM formulation, which makes it possible to solve the model coefficients using existing optimization solvers. Furthermore, we compare KC-GLM and several well-known variable selection techniques via a simulation study and on two real datasets of prostate cancer and lung cancer, respectively. These experiments show that KC-GLM selects variables with better interpretability, avoids producing counter-intuitive and misleading results, and has better prediction accuracy.

基于知识约束的广义线性模型的放疗毒性预测
放射治疗(RT)是治疗癌症的一线方法。虽然放射剂量传递的目标是肿瘤,但不可避免地会有剂量泄漏到附近的正常器官,造成并发症。这种现象被称为放疗毒性。为了预测毒性的结果,可以根据有风险的正常器官(OAR)接收到的剂量变量建立统计模型,即正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型。为了应对剂量测定变量的高维度和临床样本量有限的挑战,采用变量选择技术的统计模型是可行的选择。然而,现有的变量选择技术都是数据驱动的,并没有将医学领域的知识融入到模型表述中。我们提出了一种知识约束广义线性模型(KC-GLM)。KC-GLM 包括一种新的数学公式,可将三项领域知识转化为模型系数的非负性、单调性和相邻相似性约束。我们还进一步提出了 KC-GLM 公式的等价转换,这使得使用现有优化求解器求解模型系数成为可能。此外,我们还通过模拟研究并分别在前列腺癌和肺癌的两个真实数据集上比较了 KC-GLM 和几种著名的变量选择技术。这些实验表明,KC-GLM 选择的变量具有更好的可解释性,避免了产生反直觉和误导性的结果,并具有更好的预测准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信