Lilith, Inanna, and God Images in Myth: Working with Relational Trauma in Jungian Analysis

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
Karen A. Lipsky
{"title":"Lilith, Inanna, and God Images in Myth: Working with Relational Trauma in Jungian Analysis","authors":"Karen A. Lipsky","doi":"10.1080/00332925.2022.2138230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores and defines trauma and several patterns of adaptive responses within a self-care system partially using the framework of Donald Kalsched. It examines two ancient myths: one, the myth of Lilith and Inanna; and two, the myth of Lilith, Adam, and God. The first myth is set within a matriarchal culture and the second myth within a patriarchal culture. These stories are analyzed through the lens of trauma, the emotional textures of affect, and the development of consciousness. Analyzing these myths facilitates the contextualization of irrational behavioral responses as trauma responses and identifies several typical patterns of traumatic response. This can reveal the personal context of traumatization and relevant archetypal energies. This can help bridge one’s personal psychology to a mythic or transpersonal reality, which, in turn, helps the development of the ego in relation to the Self, and connects one to a more transpersonal dimension of reality. This can lead—within the safety of the analytical relationship—toward possible paths of psychic reintegration and the healing of split-off psychic parts.","PeriodicalId":42460,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Perspectives-A Quarterly Journal of Jungian Thought","volume":"65 1","pages":"322 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Perspectives-A Quarterly Journal of Jungian Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2022.2138230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores and defines trauma and several patterns of adaptive responses within a self-care system partially using the framework of Donald Kalsched. It examines two ancient myths: one, the myth of Lilith and Inanna; and two, the myth of Lilith, Adam, and God. The first myth is set within a matriarchal culture and the second myth within a patriarchal culture. These stories are analyzed through the lens of trauma, the emotional textures of affect, and the development of consciousness. Analyzing these myths facilitates the contextualization of irrational behavioral responses as trauma responses and identifies several typical patterns of traumatic response. This can reveal the personal context of traumatization and relevant archetypal energies. This can help bridge one’s personal psychology to a mythic or transpersonal reality, which, in turn, helps the development of the ego in relation to the Self, and connects one to a more transpersonal dimension of reality. This can lead—within the safety of the analytical relationship—toward possible paths of psychic reintegration and the healing of split-off psychic parts.
莉莉丝、伊娜娜与神话中的上帝形象——荣格分析中的关系创伤
本文部分使用Donald Kalsched的框架来探索和定义自我护理系统中的创伤和几种适应性反应模式。它考察了两个古老的神话:一个是莉莉丝和伊娜娜的神话;第二,莉莉斯、亚当和上帝的神话。第一个神话发生在母系文化中,而第二个神话则发生在父权文化中。这些故事是通过创伤的镜头、情感的情感纹理和意识的发展来分析的。分析这些神话有助于将非理性行为反应视为创伤反应,并确定创伤反应的几种典型模式。这可以揭示创伤的个人背景和相关的原型能量。这可以帮助将一个人的个人心理连接到神话或超个人的现实,反过来,这又有助于自我相对于自我的发展,并将一个人与现实的更超个人维度联系起来。在分析关系的安全范围内,这可以导致心理重新融合和治愈分离的心理部分的可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信