The Qianke system in China: Disorganisation, discrimination and dispersion

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Enshen Li
{"title":"The Qianke system in China: Disorganisation, discrimination and dispersion","authors":"Enshen Li","doi":"10.1177/17488958231161436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Chinese criminal legal system, the term ‘Qianke’ (前科) is conceptually interchangeable with the idea of a criminal record that lists one’s past crimes, convictions and sentences. In this article, by situating Qianke within the context of China’s distinct criminal justice and social governance ethos, my central claim is that the status quo of the Qianke system features disorganised, discriminatory and dispersed modes of social and penal controls. Specifically, the management of Qianke represents an uncoordinated structure in which criminal record data are regulated by divergent rules and institutions but remain under the complete control of the state. Although largely inaccessible to the general public, the discriminatory effect of Qianke is sweeping. By and large, it is characterised by the imposition of restraints on not only individuals with a criminal record but also their families in accessing equal opportunities in education, employment and public services. This distinctive form of state discrimination is informed by an emerging concern with risk prevention within Chinese criminal justice policy which is further enhanced by Qianke’s orchestrated penetration into the social system (e.g. via the Social Credit System). Moving from the criminal legal system to the social system, Qianke also serves as a tool of control aimed at managing individuals with a criminal history in a way that is conducive to the state’s prioritised governance agenda.","PeriodicalId":47217,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","volume":"23 1","pages":"568 - 587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231161436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Chinese criminal legal system, the term ‘Qianke’ (前科) is conceptually interchangeable with the idea of a criminal record that lists one’s past crimes, convictions and sentences. In this article, by situating Qianke within the context of China’s distinct criminal justice and social governance ethos, my central claim is that the status quo of the Qianke system features disorganised, discriminatory and dispersed modes of social and penal controls. Specifically, the management of Qianke represents an uncoordinated structure in which criminal record data are regulated by divergent rules and institutions but remain under the complete control of the state. Although largely inaccessible to the general public, the discriminatory effect of Qianke is sweeping. By and large, it is characterised by the imposition of restraints on not only individuals with a criminal record but also their families in accessing equal opportunities in education, employment and public services. This distinctive form of state discrimination is informed by an emerging concern with risk prevention within Chinese criminal justice policy which is further enhanced by Qianke’s orchestrated penetration into the social system (e.g. via the Social Credit System). Moving from the criminal legal system to the social system, Qianke also serves as a tool of control aimed at managing individuals with a criminal history in a way that is conducive to the state’s prioritised governance agenda.
中国的千科制度:无序、歧视与分散
在中国的刑事法律体系中,“钱科”一词(前科) 在概念上可以与列出过去罪行、定罪和判刑的犯罪记录的概念互换。在这篇文章中,通过将钱科置于中国独特的刑事司法和社会治理精神的背景下,我的中心主张是,钱科制度的现状具有无序、歧视和分散的社会和刑事控制模式。具体而言,钱科的管理代表了一种不协调的结构,犯罪记录数据受到不同规则和机构的监管,但仍处于国家的完全控制之下。尽管大众基本上无法接触到钱客,但钱客的歧视性影响是全面的。总的来说,它的特点是不仅限制有犯罪记录的个人,而且限制他们的家人在教育、就业和公共服务方面获得平等机会。这种独特的国家歧视形式源于中国刑事司法政策中对风险预防的新关注,而钱科精心策划的对社会体系的渗透(例如通过社会信用体系)进一步加强了这一关注。从刑事法律体系转移到社会体系,千科还充当了一种控制工具,旨在以有利于国家优先治理议程的方式管理有犯罪史的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminology & Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信