Florian Roghmann, Peter J Goebell, Lars Dyrskjøt, Bas W G van Rhijn, Heiko U Käfferlein, Oliver Hakenberg, Arnulf Stenzl, Maximilian Burger, Beate Pesch, Natalya Benderska-Söder, Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
{"title":"Sensitivity and Specificity in Urine Bladder Cancer Markers - Is it that Simple?","authors":"Florian Roghmann, Peter J Goebell, Lars Dyrskjøt, Bas W G van Rhijn, Heiko U Käfferlein, Oliver Hakenberg, Arnulf Stenzl, Maximilian Burger, Beate Pesch, Natalya Benderska-Söder, Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger","doi":"10.3233/BLC-211602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Marker research, and in particular urine bladder cancer marker research throughout the past three decades, devours enormous scientific resources in terms of manpower (not to mention time spent on reviewing and editorial efforts) and financial resources, finally generating large numbers of manuscripts without affecting clinical decision making. This is mirrored by the fact that current guidelines do not recommend marker use due to missing level 1 evidence. Although we recognize the problems and obstacles, the authors of this commentary feel that the time has come to abandon the current procedures and move on to prospective trial designs implementing marker results into clinical decision making. Our thoughts and concerns are summarized in this comment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-211602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marker research, and in particular urine bladder cancer marker research throughout the past three decades, devours enormous scientific resources in terms of manpower (not to mention time spent on reviewing and editorial efforts) and financial resources, finally generating large numbers of manuscripts without affecting clinical decision making. This is mirrored by the fact that current guidelines do not recommend marker use due to missing level 1 evidence. Although we recognize the problems and obstacles, the authors of this commentary feel that the time has come to abandon the current procedures and move on to prospective trial designs implementing marker results into clinical decision making. Our thoughts and concerns are summarized in this comment.
期刊介绍：
Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
