Determination of the effect of Nigella sativa on blood pressure; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Q4 Medicine
M. Fakhri, M. Yousofpour, M. Moosazadeh, A. Fatahian, M. Azadbakht, Melina Ramezanpour
{"title":"Determination of the effect of Nigella sativa on blood pressure; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"M. Fakhri, M. Yousofpour, M. Moosazadeh, A. Fatahian, M. Azadbakht, Melina Ramezanpour","doi":"10.34172/jnp.2023.21474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hypertension is considered a significant and highly prevalent public health problem. Due to the wide application of the medicinal herb Nigella sativa in managing this condition, the present study aims to evaluate the effect of N. sativa consumption on reducing blood pressure (BP) levels using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Materials and Methods: Multiple online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and the Google Scholar search engine, were searched using standard keywords to identify relevant articles up to May 9, 2022. Data were analyzed using STATA 14 software, and the significance level was taken as P<0.05 for all tests. Results: From the total of 12 reviewed studies with a sample size of 854, the consumption of N. sativa powder (SMD: -0.46; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.30) and N. sativa oil (SMD: -2.04; 95% CI: -2.75, -1.34) lowered the systolic BP (SBP) levels. The consumption of N. sativa powder (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.28) and N. sativa oil (SMD: -2.31; 95% CI: -3.05, -1.57) altered the diastolic BP (DBP) level. Then, the standard effect sizes of N. sativa consumption on triglyceride (SMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.29, 0), LDL-C (SMD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.17), HDL-C (SMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.16) and FBS (SMD: -0.36; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.15) levels were measured. Conclusion: Nigella sativa consumption showed a higher impact on reducing SBP than DBP levels. In addition, the consumption of N. sativa oil was more effective in lowering BP levels than N. sativa powder. Hence, further research is suggested to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of N. sativa oil and powder. Registration: This study has been compiled based on the PRISMA checklist, and its protocol was registered on the PROSPERO website (ID: CRD42022336951).","PeriodicalId":16515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephropathology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephropathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jnp.2023.21474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension is considered a significant and highly prevalent public health problem. Due to the wide application of the medicinal herb Nigella sativa in managing this condition, the present study aims to evaluate the effect of N. sativa consumption on reducing blood pressure (BP) levels using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Materials and Methods: Multiple online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and the Google Scholar search engine, were searched using standard keywords to identify relevant articles up to May 9, 2022. Data were analyzed using STATA 14 software, and the significance level was taken as P<0.05 for all tests. Results: From the total of 12 reviewed studies with a sample size of 854, the consumption of N. sativa powder (SMD: -0.46; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.30) and N. sativa oil (SMD: -2.04; 95% CI: -2.75, -1.34) lowered the systolic BP (SBP) levels. The consumption of N. sativa powder (SMD: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.28) and N. sativa oil (SMD: -2.31; 95% CI: -3.05, -1.57) altered the diastolic BP (DBP) level. Then, the standard effect sizes of N. sativa consumption on triglyceride (SMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.29, 0), LDL-C (SMD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.17), HDL-C (SMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.16) and FBS (SMD: -0.36; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.15) levels were measured. Conclusion: Nigella sativa consumption showed a higher impact on reducing SBP than DBP levels. In addition, the consumption of N. sativa oil was more effective in lowering BP levels than N. sativa powder. Hence, further research is suggested to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of N. sativa oil and powder. Registration: This study has been compiled based on the PRISMA checklist, and its protocol was registered on the PROSPERO website (ID: CRD42022336951).
奈杰尔拉对血压影响的测定;随机临床试验的系统综述和荟萃分析
引言:高血压被认为是一个重要且高度普遍的公共卫生问题。由于草药Nigella sativa在治疗这种疾病方面的广泛应用,本研究旨在通过系统综述和荟萃分析方法评估食用N.sativa对降低血压(BP)水平的影响。材料和方法:使用标准关键词搜索多个在线数据库,包括PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、Web of Science和Google Scholar搜索引擎,以识别截至2022年5月9日的相关文章。使用STATA 14软件对数据进行分析,所有测试的显著性水平均为P<0.05。结果:在总共12项样本量为854的综述研究中,食用N.sativa粉末(SMD:-0.46;95%CI:-0.63,-0.30)和N.satival油(SMD:-2.04;95%CI:-2.75,-1.34)可降低收缩压(SBP)水平。食用N.sativa粉(SMD:-0.45;95%CI:-0.63,-0.28)和N.satival油(SMD:-2.31;95%CI:-3.05,-1.57)可改变舒张压(DBP)水平。然后,测定了食用N.sativa对甘油三酯(SMD:-0.14;95%CI:-0.29,0)、LDL-C(SMD:-0.35;95%CI:-0.54,-0.17)、HDL-C(SMD:0.01;95%CI:-0.14,0.16)和FBS(SMD:-0.56;95%CI:0.58,-0.115)水平的标准效应大小。结论:与DBP水平相比,食用Nigella sativa对降低SBP的影响更大。此外,食用紫花苜蓿油比食用紫花苜蓿粉更能有效降低血压。因此,建议进行进一步的研究,以评估和比较N.sativa油和粉末的有效性。注册:本研究基于PRISMA检查表编制,其方案已在PROSPERO网站(ID:CRD42022336951)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephropathology
Journal of Nephropathology Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信