A call to include attachment-based concepts in tailored treatments for obesity

J. Robins, Russel Ayling
{"title":"A call to include attachment-based concepts in tailored treatments for obesity","authors":"J. Robins, Russel Ayling","doi":"10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological contributing factors in obesity include attachment style and emotion dysregulation. Little is known about the relationship between attachment style and responses to treatment in obesity.This study set out to identify the average weight loss for a group treatment for obesity based on diet changes and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) strategies, investigate whether attachment style predicts weight loss, and explore participants’ experience of the group treatment.52 participants completed an attachment measure at the start of treatment. Body Mass Index (BMI) measures were taken at the start and end of treatment. The average weight loss was calculated and a backwards multiple regression tested whether the five attachment dimensions could predict participants’ change in BMI. Seven of the participants then took part in semi-structured interviews about the experience of the treatment. Transcripts were subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).The average weight loss was 2.2 per cent of the starting body weight. Quantitative findings produced a model which showed that the participants who scored higher on attachment security lost less weight than those with insecure attachments. Qualitative findings centred around four themes regarding the group experience: Dependency; Identification; Comparison to Others; and Negative Aspects of the Group Experience. Participants also described having difficulties with self-soothing, having had unmet needs in childhood, and the experience of recurrent depression.This study demonstrates poor weight loss from group treatments for obesity based on diet changes and CBT strategies. However, it suggests that those with insecure attachment may be better suited to CBT-type courses than those who are securely attached. The qualitative themes offer possible explanations as to why the treatment did not result in significant weight loss and potential reasons for the well documented weight regain following treatment for obesity. The implications are that treatment for obesity should be tailor-made, consider attachment style, and consider the need to attend to emotion regulation.","PeriodicalId":36758,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Psychological contributing factors in obesity include attachment style and emotion dysregulation. Little is known about the relationship between attachment style and responses to treatment in obesity.This study set out to identify the average weight loss for a group treatment for obesity based on diet changes and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) strategies, investigate whether attachment style predicts weight loss, and explore participants’ experience of the group treatment.52 participants completed an attachment measure at the start of treatment. Body Mass Index (BMI) measures were taken at the start and end of treatment. The average weight loss was calculated and a backwards multiple regression tested whether the five attachment dimensions could predict participants’ change in BMI. Seven of the participants then took part in semi-structured interviews about the experience of the treatment. Transcripts were subjected to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).The average weight loss was 2.2 per cent of the starting body weight. Quantitative findings produced a model which showed that the participants who scored higher on attachment security lost less weight than those with insecure attachments. Qualitative findings centred around four themes regarding the group experience: Dependency; Identification; Comparison to Others; and Negative Aspects of the Group Experience. Participants also described having difficulties with self-soothing, having had unmet needs in childhood, and the experience of recurrent depression.This study demonstrates poor weight loss from group treatments for obesity based on diet changes and CBT strategies. However, it suggests that those with insecure attachment may be better suited to CBT-type courses than those who are securely attached. The qualitative themes offer possible explanations as to why the treatment did not result in significant weight loss and potential reasons for the well documented weight regain following treatment for obesity. The implications are that treatment for obesity should be tailor-made, consider attachment style, and consider the need to attend to emotion regulation.
呼吁将基于依恋的概念纳入量身定制的肥胖治疗中
肥胖的心理因素包括依恋方式和情绪调节障碍。对肥胖患者的依恋方式和治疗反应之间的关系知之甚少。这项研究旨在根据饮食变化和认知行为疗法(CBT)策略确定肥胖群体治疗的平均体重减轻,调查依恋方式是否可以预测体重减轻,并探索参与者对群体治疗的体验。52名参与者在治疗开始时完成了依恋测量。在治疗开始和结束时测量身体质量指数(BMI)。计算平均体重减轻,并通过向后多元回归测试五个依恋维度是否可以预测参与者的BMI变化。七名参与者随后参加了关于治疗经验的半结构化访谈。转录本接受解释性现象学分析(IPA)。平均体重减轻为起始体重的2.2%。定量研究结果产生了一个模型,该模型显示,依恋安全性得分较高的参与者比依恋不安全的参与者体重减轻得更少。定性研究结果围绕着关于群体体验的四个主题:依赖;识别与他人的比较;以及集体经验的消极方面。参与者还描述了自我安慰方面的困难,儿童时期的需求未得到满足,以及反复发作的抑郁症的经历。这项研究表明,基于饮食变化和CBT策略的肥胖群体治疗减肥效果不佳。然而,它表明,那些依恋不安全的人可能比那些依恋安全的人更适合CBT类型的课程。定性主题提供了可能的解释,说明为什么治疗没有显著减轻体重,以及肥胖治疗后体重回升的潜在原因。这意味着肥胖的治疗应该量体裁衣,考虑依恋方式,并考虑到情绪调节的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Review
Counselling Psychology Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信