"Why Do You Pretend to Be So Detached from Your Jewish Feelings?": Toward an Affective Reading of Jewish Diaspora

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Jacqueline Krass
{"title":"\"Why Do You Pretend to Be So Detached from Your Jewish Feelings?\": Toward an Affective Reading of Jewish Diaspora","authors":"Jacqueline Krass","doi":"10.1353/prs.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Through a comparative reading of Chris Kraus's novel Torpor (2006) and Philip Roth's novel The Counterlife (1986), this essay develops a theory of Jewish affect that privileges negative feelings as key to articulating counterhegemonic political and ethnic Jewish American identities. Drawing, in part, on the work of Benjamin Schreier and other scholars who have sought to broaden the field of Jewish American Literary Studies, this essay argues that affect also permits the inclusion of a writer like Kraus whose fiction might otherwise be dismissed as insufficiently knowledgeable about Jewish religious or linguistic experience. The writings of Kraus and Roth engage with the question of the primacy of Jewish identity in late-twentieth-century America, posing negative feelings as anarchic but ultimately central to a contemporary Jewishness that does not seek to ally itself with power. The essay argues both that Jewish American Literary Studies would benefit from a deeper engagement with affect theory, and also that negative or \"minor\" affects are particularly significant as vectors of political meaning-making in a Jewish American context.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2022.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Through a comparative reading of Chris Kraus's novel Torpor (2006) and Philip Roth's novel The Counterlife (1986), this essay develops a theory of Jewish affect that privileges negative feelings as key to articulating counterhegemonic political and ethnic Jewish American identities. Drawing, in part, on the work of Benjamin Schreier and other scholars who have sought to broaden the field of Jewish American Literary Studies, this essay argues that affect also permits the inclusion of a writer like Kraus whose fiction might otherwise be dismissed as insufficiently knowledgeable about Jewish religious or linguistic experience. The writings of Kraus and Roth engage with the question of the primacy of Jewish identity in late-twentieth-century America, posing negative feelings as anarchic but ultimately central to a contemporary Jewishness that does not seek to ally itself with power. The essay argues both that Jewish American Literary Studies would benefit from a deeper engagement with affect theory, and also that negative or "minor" affects are particularly significant as vectors of political meaning-making in a Jewish American context.
“为什么你要假装与犹太人的感情如此超然?”《对犹太人流散的情感解读》
摘要:通过对克里斯·克劳斯(Chris Kraus)2006年的小说《托波尔》(Torpor)和菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth。本文在一定程度上借鉴了本杰明·施赖尔和其他试图拓宽犹太裔美国文学研究领域的学者的工作,认为这种影响也允许纳入像克劳斯这样的作家,否则他的小说可能会被认为对犹太宗教或语言经验知之甚少。克劳斯和罗斯的著作涉及20世纪末美国犹太人身份的首要地位问题,将负面情绪视为无政府主义,但最终是当代犹太主义的核心,这种犹太主义不寻求与权力结盟。这篇文章认为,犹太裔美国文学研究将受益于更深入地参与情感理论,而且负面或“轻微”情感作为犹太裔美国背景下政治意义形成的载体尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信