Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite and Compomer in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Chetanya Sharma, Harjeet Kaur, Medhavi Aggarwal, Sapna Jakhu
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite and Compomer in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Chetanya Sharma, Harjeet Kaur, Medhavi Aggarwal, Sapna Jakhu","doi":"10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Because the main dislodging pressures at the tooth restoration interface have a shearing effect, shear bond strength is crucial for the restorative material clinically. Therefore, greater shear bond strength suggests improved material to tooth bonding. Glass ionomer cement and composite is the most popularly used restorative material. Composite resins have better mechanical properties and esthetics than many other types of cement, but they need bonding agents as they are hydrophobic and hence fail to adhere to the teeth. Compomers are polyacid modified resin composites. Compomer and composite resin have similar physical properties, as they are thought to bond to dentin by micromechanical bonding. As resin composites are used in this, the polymerized acid monomer shows acidity when it comes in contact with the saliva and there is a reaction of fluoride-containing basic glass resulting in the cariostatic effect. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX GP), Composite Resin (Filtek Z-250) and Compomer, (Compoglass, Ivoclar). Material and Method: An in-vitro, experimental study was conducted on 30 freshly extracted over-retained deciduous molars. Samples were randomly divided into three groups depending on the material to be used. Flat dentinal surface on tooth was prepared over which restorative materials were placed. The prepared specimen was subjected to shear test and the value obtained was compared. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate the mean shear bond strength of each group. Result: It was observed from the study that the composite resin had the highest shear bond strength value (17.13 ± 1.54), followed by compomer (11.32 ± 1.05) whereas GIC showed the least shear bond strength (6.56 ± 0.87). Conclusion: It was concluded that composite restorative materials show higher shear bond strength than glass ionomer cement and compomer in primary molars, but shear bond strength of compomer was higher than that of glass ionomer cement.","PeriodicalId":93501,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because the main dislodging pressures at the tooth restoration interface have a shearing effect, shear bond strength is crucial for the restorative material clinically. Therefore, greater shear bond strength suggests improved material to tooth bonding. Glass ionomer cement and composite is the most popularly used restorative material. Composite resins have better mechanical properties and esthetics than many other types of cement, but they need bonding agents as they are hydrophobic and hence fail to adhere to the teeth. Compomers are polyacid modified resin composites. Compomer and composite resin have similar physical properties, as they are thought to bond to dentin by micromechanical bonding. As resin composites are used in this, the polymerized acid monomer shows acidity when it comes in contact with the saliva and there is a reaction of fluoride-containing basic glass resulting in the cariostatic effect. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX GP), Composite Resin (Filtek Z-250) and Compomer, (Compoglass, Ivoclar). Material and Method: An in-vitro, experimental study was conducted on 30 freshly extracted over-retained deciduous molars. Samples were randomly divided into three groups depending on the material to be used. Flat dentinal surface on tooth was prepared over which restorative materials were placed. The prepared specimen was subjected to shear test and the value obtained was compared. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate the mean shear bond strength of each group. Result: It was observed from the study that the composite resin had the highest shear bond strength value (17.13 ± 1.54), followed by compomer (11.32 ± 1.05) whereas GIC showed the least shear bond strength (6.56 ± 0.87). Conclusion: It was concluded that composite restorative materials show higher shear bond strength than glass ionomer cement and compomer in primary molars, but shear bond strength of compomer was higher than that of glass ionomer cement.
玻璃离聚体水门铁、复合材料和复合材料在乳牙中剪切强度的比较研究
背景:由于牙体修复界面的主要移位压力具有剪切作用,因此剪切粘结强度在临床上对修复材料至关重要。因此,更大的剪切粘接强度表明材料与齿的粘接得到改善。玻璃离子水门合剂和复合材料是最常用的修复材料。复合树脂比许多其他类型的水泥具有更好的机械性能和美观性,但它们需要粘合剂,因为它们是疏水性的,因此不能粘附在牙齿上。复合材料是聚酸改性树脂复合材料。聚合物和复合树脂具有相似的物理性质,因为它们被认为是通过微机械键合与牙本质结合。由于树脂复合材料用于此,聚合的酸性单体与唾液接触时呈现酸性,并且与含氟化物的碱性玻璃发生反应,从而产生固牙效果。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较玻璃离子水泥(Fuji IX GP)、复合树脂(Filtek Z-250)和复合材料(Compoglass, Ivoclar)的剪切强度。材料与方法:对30颗刚拔除的过留乳牙进行了体外实验研究。根据使用的材料,样本被随机分为三组。牙本质表面平整,放置修复材料。对所制备的试件进行了剪切试验,并进行了数值比较。采用描述性统计分析计算各组的平均剪切强度。结果:复合树脂的剪切结合强度最高(17.13±1.54),其次是复合树脂(11.32±1.05),GIC的剪切结合强度最低(6.56±0.87)。结论:复合修复材料在初生磨牙的剪切结合强度高于玻璃离子水门合剂和复合材料,但复合材料的剪切结合强度高于玻璃离子水门合剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信