The Courts in the Face of the COVID-19 Crisis: An Analysis of the Measures Adopted by the Brazilian Judicial System
Q2 Social Sciences
Renato Máximo Sátiro, Jessica Vitorino Martins, M. Sousa
求助PDF
{"title":"The Courts in the Face of the COVID-19 Crisis: An Analysis of the Measures Adopted by the Brazilian Judicial System","authors":"Renato Máximo Sátiro, Jessica Vitorino Martins, M. Sousa","doi":"10.36745/IJCA.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis caused by COVID-19 has triggered a series of changes at the global level, resulting in a rapid change in the way social relations are organized. The state is no exception to this complex scenario, and is responsible for making available to citizens the various administrative provisions essential to life in society, one of which is justice. In this context, the aim of the present work is to analyse the institutional response of the judiciary branch in Brazil to the pandemic period of the new coronavirus, contrasting the normative actions taken by the judiciary with the results obtained with these interventions. To that end, at first, the main regulations that have underpinned the conduct, positioning and action of the judiciary since the beginning of the crisis in Brazil, which occurred in March 2020, were collected and analysed in a total of 57 official documents issued by the Brazilian justice authorities. A posteriori, the report “Assessment of the impacts of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 on the court’s work processes” was analysed, which includes analyses related to the adoption of rules relevant to issues of administrative management, procedural management and also the perceptions of impacts and difficulties due to the pandemic, as well as the other official documents published by the National Council of Justice – CNJ that provides statistics about the judicial indicators in times of pandemic. The data show a fast and comprehensive performance in the various fields in which justice operates, revealing a concern with health, social, administrative issues, among other aspects. The Judiciary has acted in an administrative unit, based on the regulations of a higher authority or of higher courts. © 2021. The Author(s).","PeriodicalId":37676,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Court Administration","volume":"12 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Court Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36745/IJCA.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The crisis caused by COVID-19 has triggered a series of changes at the global level, resulting in a rapid change in the way social relations are organized. The state is no exception to this complex scenario, and is responsible for making available to citizens the various administrative provisions essential to life in society, one of which is justice. In this context, the aim of the present work is to analyse the institutional response of the judiciary branch in Brazil to the pandemic period of the new coronavirus, contrasting the normative actions taken by the judiciary with the results obtained with these interventions. To that end, at first, the main regulations that have underpinned the conduct, positioning and action of the judiciary since the beginning of the crisis in Brazil, which occurred in March 2020, were collected and analysed in a total of 57 official documents issued by the Brazilian justice authorities. A posteriori, the report “Assessment of the impacts of the pandemic caused by COVID-19 on the court’s work processes” was analysed, which includes analyses related to the adoption of rules relevant to issues of administrative management, procedural management and also the perceptions of impacts and difficulties due to the pandemic, as well as the other official documents published by the National Council of Justice – CNJ that provides statistics about the judicial indicators in times of pandemic. The data show a fast and comprehensive performance in the various fields in which justice operates, revealing a concern with health, social, administrative issues, among other aspects. The Judiciary has acted in an administrative unit, based on the regulations of a higher authority or of higher courts. © 2021. The Author(s).
面对COVID-19危机的法院:对巴西司法系统采取措施的分析
新冠肺炎引发的危机在全球层面引发了一系列变化,导致社会关系的组织方式迅速改变。国家也不例外,有责任向公民提供对社会生活至关重要的各种行政规定,其中之一就是正义。在这方面,本工作的目的是分析巴西司法部门对新冠病毒大流行时期的机构反应,将司法部门采取的规范行动与这些干预措施取得的结果进行对比。为此,首先,巴西司法当局总共发布了57份官方文件,收集并分析了自2020年3月巴西危机开始以来,支撑司法机构行为、定位和行动的主要法规。事后分析了“评估新冠肺炎造成的大流行病对法院工作流程的影响”报告,其中包括与通过与行政管理、程序管理问题有关的规则有关的分析,以及对大流行病造成的影响和困难的看法,以及国家司法委员会发布的其他官方文件,这些文件提供了疫情期间司法指标的统计数据。数据显示,在司法运作的各个领域表现迅速而全面,显示出对健康、社会、行政问题等方面的关注。司法机构是一个行政单位,根据上级机关或上级法院的规定行事。©2021。作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Court Administration (IJCA) is an on-line journal which focuses on contemporary court administration and management. It provides a platform for the professional exchange of knowledge, experience and research in those areas for a diverse audience of practitioners and academics. Its scope is international, and the editors welcome submissions from court officials, judges, justice ministry officials, academics and others whose professional, research projects, and interests lie in the practical aspects of the effective administration of justice. IJCA is an open access journal, and its articles are subjected to a double blind peer review procedure. Please contact the editors if you are not sure whether your research falls into these categories.