Capital and World Labor: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the Nineteenth Century

Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06
Tâmis Parron
{"title":"Capital and World Labor: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Tâmis Parron","doi":"10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/context: The boom-and-bust of New World slavery in the nineteenth century has always been a major topic of scholarship. In this essay, I suggest that the literature devoted to this theme, the so-called “capitalism and slavery debate,” has made capital invisible as a category of analysis due to its over-reliance on classical and neoclassical economics. As a result, slavery itself has been poorly historicized. My purpose is to put forth an alternative framework to restore the historicity of capital and slavery. Methodology: The article explores critical value theory to conceptualize capital and capitalism in historically meaningful terms. It argues that value creation is never confined to one country. It requires a historically transnational social formation that turns concrete labor into abstract labor and use-values into commodities through the multi-scale operatives of world money and world markets. The history of slavery should be narrated within this broader globalizing setting. Originality: The article’s claim is that the global value relations of industrial capital redetermined spatial relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering overlapping layers of a world geography of accumulation that both stimulated and challenged slavery. Conclusions: While most scholars present the relation between slavery and capitalism as constant for the period 1780-1880, I conclude that New World slavery went through two moments of boom-and-bust (c.1780-c.1820 and c.1830-1880), which were formed through, respectively, the global value relations of cotton production and coal-and-iron industrialism.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit89.2023.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/context: The boom-and-bust of New World slavery in the nineteenth century has always been a major topic of scholarship. In this essay, I suggest that the literature devoted to this theme, the so-called “capitalism and slavery debate,” has made capital invisible as a category of analysis due to its over-reliance on classical and neoclassical economics. As a result, slavery itself has been poorly historicized. My purpose is to put forth an alternative framework to restore the historicity of capital and slavery. Methodology: The article explores critical value theory to conceptualize capital and capitalism in historically meaningful terms. It argues that value creation is never confined to one country. It requires a historically transnational social formation that turns concrete labor into abstract labor and use-values into commodities through the multi-scale operatives of world money and world markets. The history of slavery should be narrated within this broader globalizing setting. Originality: The article’s claim is that the global value relations of industrial capital redetermined spatial relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering overlapping layers of a world geography of accumulation that both stimulated and challenged slavery. Conclusions: While most scholars present the relation between slavery and capitalism as constant for the period 1780-1880, I conclude that New World slavery went through two moments of boom-and-bust (c.1780-c.1820 and c.1830-1880), which were formed through, respectively, the global value relations of cotton production and coal-and-iron industrialism.
分享
查看原文
资本与世界劳工:19世纪奴隶制的兴衰
目标/背景:19世纪新世界奴隶制的繁荣和萧条一直是学术界的一个主要话题。在这篇文章中,我认为,致力于这一主题的文献,即所谓的“资本主义和奴隶制辩论”,由于过度依赖古典和新古典经济学,使资本作为一个分析类别变得不可见。因此,奴隶制本身的历史化程度很低。我的目的是提出一个替代框架,以恢复资本和奴隶制的历史性。方法论:本文探讨了批判性价值理论,以历史意义的术语对资本和资本主义进行概念化。它认为,价值创造从来都不局限于一个国家。它需要一种历史上的跨国社会形态,通过世界货币和世界市场的多尺度运作,将具体劳动转化为抽象劳动,并将价值观转化为商品。奴隶制的历史应当在更广泛的全球化背景下叙述。原创:文章声称,工业资本的全球价值关系重新定义了城镇与乡村、资本与劳动力、生产与消费之间的空间关系,产生了世界积累地理的重叠层,既刺激了奴隶制,也挑战了奴隶制。结论:虽然大多数学者认为奴隶制和资本主义之间的关系在1780-1880年间是不变的,但我得出的结论是,新世界奴隶制经历了两个繁荣和萧条的时刻(约1780-1820年和约1830-1880年),这两个时刻分别是通过棉花生产和煤铁工业的全球价值关系形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信