{"title":"Freedom from the Law and the Experimental “Third Use”","authors":"Steven D. Paulson","doi":"10.1353/lut.2023.a905031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article addresses the Lutheran discussion of the “third use” of the law. From the doctrine’s origin in Philip Melanchthon’s Annotations on Romans and Corinthians (1522) to the attempted application in the Church Visitations, the attempt was made to apply the law to the baptized as a moral guide without the law’s trademark accusation.The shoehorn for prying a third use into our lives comes from the misguided attempt of preachers to “read their audiences” and aid in a congregation’s moral improvement. The fear of absolution leads to the notion of “dead faith” that must be dealt with beyond the gospel.Though Luther did not imagine such a thing, Melanchthon’s students continued the discussion into the Formula of Concord VI.This article’s thesis opposes attempts to add law to the Gospel: freedom, as Paul astutely argues, is not a passage to something else. It is its own goal and purpose: “For freedom! Christ has set you free” (Galatians 5:1). Freedom frees from the law—not into it. The imaginary third use of law opposes the chief doctrine of justification and is best put to rest.","PeriodicalId":81901,"journal":{"name":"Lutheran quarterly (Gettysburg, Pa. : 1949)","volume":"37 1","pages":"268 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lutheran quarterly (Gettysburg, Pa. : 1949)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2023.a905031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article addresses the Lutheran discussion of the “third use” of the law. From the doctrine’s origin in Philip Melanchthon’s Annotations on Romans and Corinthians (1522) to the attempted application in the Church Visitations, the attempt was made to apply the law to the baptized as a moral guide without the law’s trademark accusation.The shoehorn for prying a third use into our lives comes from the misguided attempt of preachers to “read their audiences” and aid in a congregation’s moral improvement. The fear of absolution leads to the notion of “dead faith” that must be dealt with beyond the gospel.Though Luther did not imagine such a thing, Melanchthon’s students continued the discussion into the Formula of Concord VI.This article’s thesis opposes attempts to add law to the Gospel: freedom, as Paul astutely argues, is not a passage to something else. It is its own goal and purpose: “For freedom! Christ has set you free” (Galatians 5:1). Freedom frees from the law—not into it. The imaginary third use of law opposes the chief doctrine of justification and is best put to rest.
摘要:本文论述了路德教会对律法“第三用途”的讨论。从菲利普·梅兰希顿(Philip Melanchthon)的《罗马书和哥林多前书注释》(1522)中教义的起源到教会访问的尝试应用,试图将法律应用于受洗者,作为一种道德指导,而没有法律的商标指控。在我们的生活中窥探第三种用途的做法,来自于牧师们误入歧途的尝试,他们试图“解读听众”,帮助会众提高道德水平。对赦免的恐惧导致了“死信心”的概念,必须在福音之外处理。虽然路德没有想象过这样的事情,但梅兰希顿的学生们继续讨论《康科德公式》(Formula of Concord vi)。这篇文章的论点反对在福音中加入律法的企图:正如保罗精明地指出的那样,自由不是通往其他东西的通道。它有自己的目标和宗旨:“为了自由!”基督已经释放了你们”(加拉太书5:1)。自由不受法律约束,而不受法律约束。想象中的第三种法律用途与称义的主要原则相抵触,最好停止使用。