Freedom from the Law and the Experimental “Third Use”

Steven D. Paulson
{"title":"Freedom from the Law and the Experimental “Third Use”","authors":"Steven D. Paulson","doi":"10.1353/lut.2023.a905031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article addresses the Lutheran discussion of the “third use” of the law. From the doctrine’s origin in Philip Melanchthon’s Annotations on Romans and Corinthians (1522) to the attempted application in the Church Visitations, the attempt was made to apply the law to the baptized as a moral guide without the law’s trademark accusation.The shoehorn for prying a third use into our lives comes from the misguided attempt of preachers to “read their audiences” and aid in a congregation’s moral improvement. The fear of absolution leads to the notion of “dead faith” that must be dealt with beyond the gospel.Though Luther did not imagine such a thing, Melanchthon’s students continued the discussion into the Formula of Concord VI.This article’s thesis opposes attempts to add law to the Gospel: freedom, as Paul astutely argues, is not a passage to something else. It is its own goal and purpose: “For freedom! Christ has set you free” (Galatians 5:1). Freedom frees from the law—not into it. The imaginary third use of law opposes the chief doctrine of justification and is best put to rest.","PeriodicalId":81901,"journal":{"name":"Lutheran quarterly (Gettysburg, Pa. : 1949)","volume":"37 1","pages":"268 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lutheran quarterly (Gettysburg, Pa. : 1949)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2023.a905031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article addresses the Lutheran discussion of the “third use” of the law. From the doctrine’s origin in Philip Melanchthon’s Annotations on Romans and Corinthians (1522) to the attempted application in the Church Visitations, the attempt was made to apply the law to the baptized as a moral guide without the law’s trademark accusation.The shoehorn for prying a third use into our lives comes from the misguided attempt of preachers to “read their audiences” and aid in a congregation’s moral improvement. The fear of absolution leads to the notion of “dead faith” that must be dealt with beyond the gospel.Though Luther did not imagine such a thing, Melanchthon’s students continued the discussion into the Formula of Concord VI.This article’s thesis opposes attempts to add law to the Gospel: freedom, as Paul astutely argues, is not a passage to something else. It is its own goal and purpose: “For freedom! Christ has set you free” (Galatians 5:1). Freedom frees from the law—not into it. The imaginary third use of law opposes the chief doctrine of justification and is best put to rest.
法律自由与实验性的“第三次使用”
摘要:本文论述了路德教会对律法“第三用途”的讨论。从菲利普·梅兰希顿(Philip Melanchthon)的《罗马书和哥林多前书注释》(1522)中教义的起源到教会访问的尝试应用,试图将法律应用于受洗者,作为一种道德指导,而没有法律的商标指控。在我们的生活中窥探第三种用途的做法,来自于牧师们误入歧途的尝试,他们试图“解读听众”,帮助会众提高道德水平。对赦免的恐惧导致了“死信心”的概念,必须在福音之外处理。虽然路德没有想象过这样的事情,但梅兰希顿的学生们继续讨论《康科德公式》(Formula of Concord vi)。这篇文章的论点反对在福音中加入律法的企图:正如保罗精明地指出的那样,自由不是通往其他东西的通道。它有自己的目标和宗旨:“为了自由!”基督已经释放了你们”(加拉太书5:1)。自由不受法律约束,而不受法律约束。想象中的第三种法律用途与称义的主要原则相抵触,最好停止使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书