Analysis of Roll Decay for Surface-ship Model Experiments with Uncertainty Estimates

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
J. Park
{"title":"Analysis of Roll Decay for Surface-ship Model Experiments with Uncertainty Estimates","authors":"J. Park","doi":"10.1115/1.4063010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Roll decay of David Taylor Model Basin (DTMB) Model 5720, a 23rd scale free-running model of the research vessel (R/V) Melville, is evaluated with uncertainty estimates. Experimental roll-decay time series was accurately modeled as an exponentially decaying cosine function, which is the solution of a second-order ordinary differential equation for damping coefficient of less than one (N < 1). The curve-fit provides damping coefficient (N), period (T), and offset. Roll period in calm water was dependent on Froude number (Fr) and initial roll angle (a). Roll decay data are from 76 runs for three nominal Froude numbers, Fr = 0, 0.15, and 0.22. The initial roll angle variation was 30 to 250. The natural roll period was 2.139 10.041 s 11.9 %). The decay coefficient data were approximated by a plane in three dimensions with Fr and initial roll amplitudes (a) as the independent variables. Curve-fit results are compared to decay coefficient by log decrement and period from time between zero crossings. Examples demonstrate average values for a single roll decay event from log decrement are the same as values by the curve-fitting method within uncertainty estimates. The uncertainty estimate for the decay coefficient is significantly less by curve-fit method in comparison to log-decrement method. By log decrement, the relative uncertainty increases with decreasing roll amplitude peak; consequently, focus should be on the damping coefficient at the largest peaks, where the uncertainty is the smallest.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roll decay of David Taylor Model Basin (DTMB) Model 5720, a 23rd scale free-running model of the research vessel (R/V) Melville, is evaluated with uncertainty estimates. Experimental roll-decay time series was accurately modeled as an exponentially decaying cosine function, which is the solution of a second-order ordinary differential equation for damping coefficient of less than one (N < 1). The curve-fit provides damping coefficient (N), period (T), and offset. Roll period in calm water was dependent on Froude number (Fr) and initial roll angle (a). Roll decay data are from 76 runs for three nominal Froude numbers, Fr = 0, 0.15, and 0.22. The initial roll angle variation was 30 to 250. The natural roll period was 2.139 10.041 s 11.9 %). The decay coefficient data were approximated by a plane in three dimensions with Fr and initial roll amplitudes (a) as the independent variables. Curve-fit results are compared to decay coefficient by log decrement and period from time between zero crossings. Examples demonstrate average values for a single roll decay event from log decrement are the same as values by the curve-fitting method within uncertainty estimates. The uncertainty estimate for the decay coefficient is significantly less by curve-fit method in comparison to log-decrement method. By log decrement, the relative uncertainty increases with decreasing roll amplitude peak; consequently, focus should be on the damping coefficient at the largest peaks, where the uncertainty is the smallest.
带不确定性估计的水面舰船模型试验横摇衰减分析
采用不确定性估计方法对梅尔维尔号科考船(R/V) 23尺度自由运行模型5720模型的滚转衰减进行了评估。实验滚动衰减时间序列被精确地建模为指数衰减余弦函数,它是二阶常微分方程的解,阻尼系数小于1 (N < 1)。曲线拟合提供了阻尼系数(N)、周期(T)和偏移量。静水中的滚转周期取决于弗劳德数(Fr)和初始滚转角(a)。滚转衰减数据来自76次运行,适用于三种名义弗劳德数,Fr = 0,0.15和0.22。初始滚转角变化为30 ~ 250。自然滚动周期为2.139(10.041)(11.9%)。衰减系数数据在三维平面上近似,以Fr和初始滚动幅值(a)为自变量。曲线拟合结果与衰减系数通过对数衰减和从零交叉的时间间隔进行比较。实例表明,从对数衰减得到的单个滚动衰减事件的平均值与曲线拟合方法在不确定性估计中的值相同。曲线拟合法对衰减系数的不确定性估计明显小于对数衰减法。通过对数递减,相对不确定度随横摇振幅峰值的减小而增大;因此,重点应放在不确定性最小的最大峰处的阻尼系数上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信