Recollecting Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Archival Labor and Women's Literary Recovery

Pub Date : 2021-12-04 DOI:10.1353/tsw.2021.0021
Jennifer S. Tuttle
{"title":"Recollecting Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Archival Labor and Women's Literary Recovery","authors":"Jennifer S. Tuttle","doi":"10.1353/tsw.2021.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay analyzes the acquisition of the Charlotte Perkins Gilman Papers by the Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America. Drawing on institutional records and using the Gilman papers as a case study, the essay challenges the prevailing conception of women's literary recovery as originating in discoveries by scholars conducting archival research. Instead, honoring yet decentering that work, the essay recognizes the labor of archivists as recovery and not merely a precondition for it. Extending J. Samaine Lockwood's notion of \"recollection\" (the collective action of writers and activists to reframe historical narratives), the essay argues for a more capacious and inclusive definition of recovery. Beyond broadening our assessment of Gilman's influence and impact, the essay demands that we consider archivists' contributions to the field of American women's literary history, the recovery that has been the engine of the field's growth, and the cultural work that that recovery has performed. The essay thus envisions recovery as a recollective process in which archivists play a formative role as equals and partners of scholars in the reconstruction of historical memory.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tsw.2021.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This essay analyzes the acquisition of the Charlotte Perkins Gilman Papers by the Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women in America. Drawing on institutional records and using the Gilman papers as a case study, the essay challenges the prevailing conception of women's literary recovery as originating in discoveries by scholars conducting archival research. Instead, honoring yet decentering that work, the essay recognizes the labor of archivists as recovery and not merely a precondition for it. Extending J. Samaine Lockwood's notion of "recollection" (the collective action of writers and activists to reframe historical narratives), the essay argues for a more capacious and inclusive definition of recovery. Beyond broadening our assessment of Gilman's influence and impact, the essay demands that we consider archivists' contributions to the field of American women's literary history, the recovery that has been the engine of the field's growth, and the cultural work that that recovery has performed. The essay thus envisions recovery as a recollective process in which archivists play a formative role as equals and partners of scholars in the reconstruction of historical memory.
分享
查看原文
回忆夏洛特·佩金斯·吉尔曼:档案劳动与女性文学复兴
摘要:本文对美国施莱辛格和伊丽莎白图书馆收藏的夏洛特·帕金斯·吉尔曼论文进行了分析。利用机构记录和使用吉尔曼论文作为案例研究,这篇文章挑战了流行的观念,即女性文学复兴起源于学者进行档案研究的发现。相反,这篇文章承认档案保管员的劳动是一种恢复,而不仅仅是恢复的先决条件,这篇文章尊重了这一工作,但又去中心化了这一工作。这篇文章扩展了J. Samaine Lockwood的“回忆”(作家和活动家重新构建历史叙事的集体行动)概念,主张对恢复进行更广泛、更包容的定义。除了扩大我们对吉尔曼的影响和影响的评估之外,这篇文章还要求我们考虑档案工作者对美国女性文学史领域的贡献,以及作为该领域增长引擎的复苏,以及这种复苏所做的文化工作。因此,本文将恢复设想为一个回忆的过程,在这个过程中,档案工作者在重建历史记忆的过程中扮演着与学者平等和合作伙伴的形成角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信