Experience‐based learning in undergraduate clinical placements: a step too soon?

R. Davidson, A. Davidson
{"title":"Experience‐based learning in undergraduate clinical placements: a step too soon?","authors":"R. Davidson, A. Davidson","doi":"10.1111/medu.13999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor We read with great interest the thoughts and opinions of Coakley et al1 in ‘ ‘Waiting in the wings’; Lived Experience at the Threshold of Clinical Practice’. We found their exploration of the transitional phase from medical student to doctor through the metaphor of an actor ‘Waiting in the wings’ highly compelling, and were particularly drawn to the solutions outlined by the authors to the problems encountered by the participants in the study, in particular the recommendation of a greater emphasis on experiencebased learning in undergraduate clinical training. As a recently appointed F1 doctor and a fourthyear medical student, we are uniquely placed to comment on this issue. Although we appreciate the problems caused by ‘transition shock’, as described, we do not agree with the proposed solution to this issue. As demonstrated in Atherley et al 2019,2 there already appears to be considerable apprehension amongst preclinical medical students regarding the transitional process to clinical training. Furthermore, we would argue that this lack of confidence in the clinical setting continues well into the penultimate and final years of medical school for many students. We believe the proposed solution to ‘transition shock’, by allowing senior medical students to ‘bear some of the burden’ of patient care in an incremental fashion, would only worsen the problems outlined by Atherley et al,2 and potentially lead to medical students feeling responsible in the event of poor patient outcome. Undergraduate clinical training commonly revolves around shadowing highly senior figures and individuals who perform highly specialist roles within the multidisciplinary team. We propose that the problem of ‘transition shock’ be eased by an increased emphasis on shadowing more junior figures within the team, allowing students to gain experience more directly applicable to the role they will be performing as newly appointed Foundation doctors.","PeriodicalId":90259,"journal":{"name":"Medical education (Chicago, Ill.)","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/medu.13999","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education (Chicago, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Editor We read with great interest the thoughts and opinions of Coakley et al1 in ‘ ‘Waiting in the wings’; Lived Experience at the Threshold of Clinical Practice’. We found their exploration of the transitional phase from medical student to doctor through the metaphor of an actor ‘Waiting in the wings’ highly compelling, and were particularly drawn to the solutions outlined by the authors to the problems encountered by the participants in the study, in particular the recommendation of a greater emphasis on experiencebased learning in undergraduate clinical training. As a recently appointed F1 doctor and a fourthyear medical student, we are uniquely placed to comment on this issue. Although we appreciate the problems caused by ‘transition shock’, as described, we do not agree with the proposed solution to this issue. As demonstrated in Atherley et al 2019,2 there already appears to be considerable apprehension amongst preclinical medical students regarding the transitional process to clinical training. Furthermore, we would argue that this lack of confidence in the clinical setting continues well into the penultimate and final years of medical school for many students. We believe the proposed solution to ‘transition shock’, by allowing senior medical students to ‘bear some of the burden’ of patient care in an incremental fashion, would only worsen the problems outlined by Atherley et al,2 and potentially lead to medical students feeling responsible in the event of poor patient outcome. Undergraduate clinical training commonly revolves around shadowing highly senior figures and individuals who perform highly specialist roles within the multidisciplinary team. We propose that the problem of ‘transition shock’ be eased by an increased emphasis on shadowing more junior figures within the team, allowing students to gain experience more directly applicable to the role they will be performing as newly appointed Foundation doctors.
基于经验的本科临床实习学习:为时过早?
编辑:我们怀着极大的兴趣读了《伺机而动》中科克利等人的思想和观点;临床实践门槛上的生活经验”。我们发现他们对从医学生到医生的过渡阶段的探索,通过一个演员“在翅膀里等待”的比喻,非常引人注目,并且特别被作者概述的解决研究参与者遇到的问题的方法所吸引,特别是建议在本科临床培训中更加强调基于经验的学习。作为一名最近被任命的F1医生和一名四年级医学生,我们有独特的立场来评论这个问题。尽管我们理解上述“过渡冲击”所造成的问题,但我们不同意对这一问题提出的解决办法。正如Atherley等人2019年所表明的那样,2在临床前医科学生中,对于向临床培训的过渡过程似乎已经有了相当大的担忧。此外,我们认为,对许多学生来说,这种对临床环境缺乏信心的情况一直持续到医学院的倒数第二年和最后几年。我们认为,通过允许高年级医学生以渐进的方式“承担一些病人护理的负担”,提出的“过渡冲击”解决方案只会使Atherley等人概述的问题恶化2,并可能导致医学生在病人预后不佳的情况下感到有责任。本科临床训练通常围绕着跟踪在多学科团队中扮演高度专业角色的高级人物和个人。我们建议通过增加对团队中更初级人物的跟踪来缓解“过渡冲击”问题,让学生获得更直接适用于他们将作为新任命的基金会医生执行的角色的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书