Retrograde Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing in Fractures of the Distal Femur: A Review of 20 Cases with an Average Follow-Up of One Year

Y. Salphale, Gopal M. Shinde, Atharva Rajesh Sharma, P. Gadegone, W. Gadegone
{"title":"Retrograde Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing in Fractures of the Distal Femur: A Review of 20 Cases with an Average Follow-Up of One Year","authors":"Y. Salphale, Gopal M. Shinde, Atharva Rajesh Sharma, P. Gadegone, W. Gadegone","doi":"10.52916/jmrs234102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In patients with distal femur fractures, we studied the role of retrograde locked intramedullary nails. Methods: Retrograde locked intramedullary nailing was used to treat the distal femur fractures of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females; mean age 47 years; range 25 to 69 years). Two patients had fracture of the distal femur and shaft. The fractures were classified as A1 (n=12), A2 (n=6), A3 (n=2), by the AO classification. There were two Grade I open fractures and 18 closed fractures. Three fractures were managed with percutaneous technique. At the mean first follow-up time of 18 months (range 15-48 months and mean second follow up at 27 months (range 12 to 68 months), the concluding functional results were assessed by using the modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee assessment scale. Results: The average time to achieve union was 24.2 weeks (range 14 to 42 weeks). One patient had a delayed union (44 weeks). Five knees (25%) had normal joint range of motion, ten knees (50%) were having range of motion from 100° to 110°, three knees (15%) were having range of motion of 80°, and two knees (10%) were having range of motion below the 80°. According to the modified HSS knee scale, the results were excellent in eleven cases (55%), good in six (30%), moderate in two (10%), and poor in one case (5%). In two patients (10%), the postoperative radiographic examination revealed varus angulation (10°), healing took place with severe distortion in one subject. None of the patient had any deep infection or wound issues. Conclusion: Retrograde femoral nailing is an effective method for treating distal femoral shaft fractures. The healing rate of femoral shaft fractures fixed with a retrograde nail is the same regardless of fracture location, patient age, gender, or degree of comminution. For good results surgical treatment, post-surgery immediate knee mobilisation and avoiding nail tip prominence in the knee are essential.","PeriodicalId":73820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical research and surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical research and surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52916/jmrs234102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In patients with distal femur fractures, we studied the role of retrograde locked intramedullary nails. Methods: Retrograde locked intramedullary nailing was used to treat the distal femur fractures of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females; mean age 47 years; range 25 to 69 years). Two patients had fracture of the distal femur and shaft. The fractures were classified as A1 (n=12), A2 (n=6), A3 (n=2), by the AO classification. There were two Grade I open fractures and 18 closed fractures. Three fractures were managed with percutaneous technique. At the mean first follow-up time of 18 months (range 15-48 months and mean second follow up at 27 months (range 12 to 68 months), the concluding functional results were assessed by using the modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee assessment scale. Results: The average time to achieve union was 24.2 weeks (range 14 to 42 weeks). One patient had a delayed union (44 weeks). Five knees (25%) had normal joint range of motion, ten knees (50%) were having range of motion from 100° to 110°, three knees (15%) were having range of motion of 80°, and two knees (10%) were having range of motion below the 80°. According to the modified HSS knee scale, the results were excellent in eleven cases (55%), good in six (30%), moderate in two (10%), and poor in one case (5%). In two patients (10%), the postoperative radiographic examination revealed varus angulation (10°), healing took place with severe distortion in one subject. None of the patient had any deep infection or wound issues. Conclusion: Retrograde femoral nailing is an effective method for treating distal femoral shaft fractures. The healing rate of femoral shaft fractures fixed with a retrograde nail is the same regardless of fracture location, patient age, gender, or degree of comminution. For good results surgical treatment, post-surgery immediate knee mobilisation and avoiding nail tip prominence in the knee are essential.
股骨远端骨折逆行交锁髓内钉治疗20例临床分析
目的:在股骨远端骨折患者中,我们研究逆行锁定髓内钉的作用。方法:采用逆行锁定髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折20例(男15例,女5例;平均年龄47岁;25至69年)。2例患者股骨远端骨折。按照AO分型将骨折分为A1 (n=12)、A2 (n=6)、A3 (n=2)。ⅰ级开放性骨折2例,闭合性骨折18例。3例骨折采用经皮穿刺技术。第一次平均随访时间为18个月(15-48个月),第二次平均随访时间为27个月(12 - 68个月),采用改良的特殊外科医院(HSS)膝关节评估量表评估患者的功能结果。结果:平均愈合时间为24.2周(14 ~ 42周)。1例延迟愈合(44周)。5个膝关节(25%)关节活动范围正常,10个膝关节(50%)关节活动范围在100°到110°之间,3个膝关节(15%)关节活动范围在80°,2个膝关节(10%)关节活动范围在80°以下。根据改良的HSS膝关节量表,11例(55%)为优,6例(30%)为良,2例(10%)为中,1例(5%)为差。2例患者(10%)术后x线检查显示内翻成角(10°),1例患者在严重扭曲的情况下愈合。所有患者都没有任何深度感染或伤口问题。结论:逆行股骨干内钉是治疗股骨干远端骨折的有效方法。无论骨折位置、患者年龄、性别或粉碎程度如何,逆行髓内钉固定股骨干骨折的治愈率是相同的。为了获得良好的手术治疗效果,术后立即活动膝关节和避免指甲尖突出膝关节是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信