Surgical Bone Adhesives with Potential Maxillofacial Applications A Systematic Review

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
A. Bhandari, Vanshika Jain, K. Muktawat, Rashi Bhandari, Ranjan Gupta
{"title":"Surgical Bone Adhesives with Potential Maxillofacial Applications A Systematic Review","authors":"A. Bhandari, Vanshika Jain, K. Muktawat, Rashi Bhandari, Ranjan Gupta","doi":"10.14429/dlsj.7.17966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reduction and stabilisation of fractured bone fragments have always been a challenging task for thesurgeon. A micro-platesystem for maxillofacial fracture treatment provides excellent results. However, plates and screws are difficult toadapt to the thin bone, and small fragments often lead to the weakening of bone causing secondary fractures. Surgical bone adhesives promise as a viable alternative for issues with micro-plates, but a lotremains desired for successful usefor clinical application. The present systematic review aims to identify the bone adhesive materials available at various stages in animal or human models in the last decade and enumerate their characteristics for potential use in non-load bearing maxillofacial fractures. PubMed electronic database searched using a combination of keywords to identify English language articles between January 2011 and December 2020 yielded a total of 1204 records, of which 15 were included for final review after applying PRISMA guidelines. Cyanoacrylate was the commonly used adhesive material followed by fibrin glue and calcium phosphate-based materials. Although encouraging, results with each material still lack human randomised control trials thus presenting inconclusive evidence. Studies on these lines are suggested along with the development of newer materials to overcome the shortcomings in the currently available systems.","PeriodicalId":36557,"journal":{"name":"Defence Life Science Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Life Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/dlsj.7.17966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reduction and stabilisation of fractured bone fragments have always been a challenging task for thesurgeon. A micro-platesystem for maxillofacial fracture treatment provides excellent results. However, plates and screws are difficult toadapt to the thin bone, and small fragments often lead to the weakening of bone causing secondary fractures. Surgical bone adhesives promise as a viable alternative for issues with micro-plates, but a lotremains desired for successful usefor clinical application. The present systematic review aims to identify the bone adhesive materials available at various stages in animal or human models in the last decade and enumerate their characteristics for potential use in non-load bearing maxillofacial fractures. PubMed electronic database searched using a combination of keywords to identify English language articles between January 2011 and December 2020 yielded a total of 1204 records, of which 15 were included for final review after applying PRISMA guidelines. Cyanoacrylate was the commonly used adhesive material followed by fibrin glue and calcium phosphate-based materials. Although encouraging, results with each material still lack human randomised control trials thus presenting inconclusive evidence. Studies on these lines are suggested along with the development of newer materials to overcome the shortcomings in the currently available systems.
具有潜在颌面应用前景的外科骨粘合剂系统评价
骨折骨碎片的复位和稳定对外科医生来说一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。用于颌面部骨折治疗的微型接骨板系统提供了极好的结果。然而,钢板和螺钉很难适应薄骨,小碎片往往会导致骨的弱化,导致继发性骨折。外科骨粘合剂有望成为解决微型接骨板问题的可行替代品,但仍有许多需要成功用于临床应用。本系统综述旨在确定过去十年中动物或人类模型中不同阶段可用的骨粘合剂材料,并列举其在非承载性颌面骨折中的潜在用途。PubMed电子数据库使用关键词组合搜索,以识别2011年1月至2020年12月期间的英语文章,共产生1204条记录,其中15条在应用PRISMA指南后被纳入最终审查。氰基丙烯酸酯是常用的粘合剂材料,其次是纤维蛋白胶和磷酸钙基材料。尽管令人鼓舞,但每种材料的结果仍然缺乏人类随机对照试验,因此提供了不确定的证据。建议在开发新材料的同时,对这些线路进行研究,以克服目前可用系统的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Defence Life Science Journal
Defence Life Science Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信