Effect of Thermal Screen Position on Greenhouse Microclimate and Impact on Crop Growth and Yield

Q4 Engineering
E. Zakir, Q. O. Ogunlowo, T. D. Akpenpuun, W. Na, M. A. Adesanya, A. Rabiu, O. Adedeji, H. Kim, H-W. Lee
{"title":"Effect of Thermal Screen Position on Greenhouse Microclimate and Impact on Crop Growth and Yield","authors":"E. Zakir, Q. O. Ogunlowo, T. D. Akpenpuun, W. Na, M. A. Adesanya, A. Rabiu, O. Adedeji, H. Kim, H-W. Lee","doi":"10.4314/njtd.v19i4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, researchers are developing methods in which producers can obtain higher yields and conserve more energy in greenhouse crop cultivation. To achieve this, thermal screens are deployed during cold nights and rolled up during the daytime. The positioning of these screens causes a reduction in the amount of solar radiation (SR) received by greenhouses, especially the single span. The impact of thermal screen position on the receipt of SR, temperature, relative humidity (RH), vapour pressure deficit (VPD), fuel consumption, and the consequent effects on crop yield and growth were investigated in this study. Two greenhouses with similar dimensions and structure but different thermal screen positions were designed, namely R-greenhouse (RGH) with thermal screens at the centre of the roof and Q-greenhouse (QGH) at five degrees (5o) Northward. Strawberries were cultivated as study crops. Statistical analysis of the recorded data of greenhouse microclimate parameters, crop growth, and yield showed that both greenhouses performed similarly in energy savings, and there was no significant difference regarding temperature, RH, and VPD. However, there were significant differences in the crop growth and yield obtained in the QGH compared to RGH. This can be attributed to the higher amount of SR received by the QGH than the SR that was received by the RGH, which was achieved because the thermal screen was installed on the north side of the Q greenhouse.","PeriodicalId":31273,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v19i4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, researchers are developing methods in which producers can obtain higher yields and conserve more energy in greenhouse crop cultivation. To achieve this, thermal screens are deployed during cold nights and rolled up during the daytime. The positioning of these screens causes a reduction in the amount of solar radiation (SR) received by greenhouses, especially the single span. The impact of thermal screen position on the receipt of SR, temperature, relative humidity (RH), vapour pressure deficit (VPD), fuel consumption, and the consequent effects on crop yield and growth were investigated in this study. Two greenhouses with similar dimensions and structure but different thermal screen positions were designed, namely R-greenhouse (RGH) with thermal screens at the centre of the roof and Q-greenhouse (QGH) at five degrees (5o) Northward. Strawberries were cultivated as study crops. Statistical analysis of the recorded data of greenhouse microclimate parameters, crop growth, and yield showed that both greenhouses performed similarly in energy savings, and there was no significant difference regarding temperature, RH, and VPD. However, there were significant differences in the crop growth and yield obtained in the QGH compared to RGH. This can be attributed to the higher amount of SR received by the QGH than the SR that was received by the RGH, which was achieved because the thermal screen was installed on the north side of the Q greenhouse.
热屏位置对温室小气候的影响及其对作物生长和产量的影响
在世界范围内,研究人员正在开发方法,使生产者能够在温室作物种植中获得更高的产量和节约更多的能源。为了实现这一点,在寒冷的夜晚部署隔热屏,在白天卷起隔热屏。这些屏幕的定位导致温室接收的太阳辐射量(SR)减少,尤其是单跨度。本研究调查了热筛位置对SR接收、温度、相对湿度(RH)、蒸汽压不足(VPD)、燃料消耗的影响,以及由此对作物产量和生长的影响。设计了两个尺寸和结构相似但隔热屏位置不同的温室,即在屋顶中心有隔热屏的R温室(RGH)和向北五度(5o)的Q温室(QGH)。草莓被当作研究作物种植。对温室小气候参数、作物生长和产量记录数据的统计分析表明,两个温室在节能方面表现相似,在温度、相对湿度和VPD方面没有显著差异。然而,与RGH相比,QGH中获得的作物生长和产量存在显著差异。这可归因于QGH接收的SR量高于RGH接收的SR,这是因为隔热屏安装在Q温室的北侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Technological Development
Nigerian Journal of Technological Development Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信