A comparative analysis of the foamy and ortho virus capsid structures reveals an ancient domain duplication

IF 2.222 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
William R. Taylor, Jonathan P. Stoye, Ian A. Taylor
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the foamy and ortho virus capsid structures reveals an ancient domain duplication","authors":"William R. Taylor,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Stoye,&nbsp;Ian A. Taylor","doi":"10.1186/s12900-017-0073-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Spumaretrovirinae</i> (foamy viruses) and the <i>Orthoretrovirinae</i> (e.g. HIV) share many similarities both in genome structure and the sequences of the core viral encoded proteins, such as the aspartyl protease and reverse transcriptase. Similarity in the <i>gag</i> region of the genome is less obvious at the sequence level but has been illuminated by the recent solution of the foamy virus capsid (CA) structure. This revealed a clear structural similarity to the orthoretrovirus capsids but with marked differences that left uncertainty in the relationship between the two domains that comprise the structure.</p><p>We have applied protein structure comparison methods in order to try and resolve this ambiguous relationship. These included both the <span>DALI</span> method and the <span>SAP</span> method, with rigorous statistical tests applied to the results of both methods. For this, we employed collections of artificial fold ’decoys’ (generated from the pair of native structures being compared) to provide a customised background distribution for each comparison, thus allowing significance levels to be estimated.</p><p>We have shown that the relationship of the two domains conforms to a simple linear correspondence rather than a domain transposition. These similarities suggest that the origin of both viral capsids was a common ancestor with a double domain structure. In addition, we show that there is also a significant structural similarity between the amino and carboxy domains in both the foamy and ortho viruses.</p><p>These results indicate that, as well as the duplication of the double domain capsid, there may have been an even more ancient gene-duplication that preceded the double domain structure. In addition, our structure comparison methodology demonstrates a general approach to problems where the components have a high intrinsic level of similarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":498,"journal":{"name":"BMC Structural Biology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2220,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12900-017-0073-0","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Structural Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12900-017-0073-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The Spumaretrovirinae (foamy viruses) and the Orthoretrovirinae (e.g. HIV) share many similarities both in genome structure and the sequences of the core viral encoded proteins, such as the aspartyl protease and reverse transcriptase. Similarity in the gag region of the genome is less obvious at the sequence level but has been illuminated by the recent solution of the foamy virus capsid (CA) structure. This revealed a clear structural similarity to the orthoretrovirus capsids but with marked differences that left uncertainty in the relationship between the two domains that comprise the structure.

We have applied protein structure comparison methods in order to try and resolve this ambiguous relationship. These included both the DALI method and the SAP method, with rigorous statistical tests applied to the results of both methods. For this, we employed collections of artificial fold ’decoys’ (generated from the pair of native structures being compared) to provide a customised background distribution for each comparison, thus allowing significance levels to be estimated.

We have shown that the relationship of the two domains conforms to a simple linear correspondence rather than a domain transposition. These similarities suggest that the origin of both viral capsids was a common ancestor with a double domain structure. In addition, we show that there is also a significant structural similarity between the amino and carboxy domains in both the foamy and ortho viruses.

These results indicate that, as well as the duplication of the double domain capsid, there may have been an even more ancient gene-duplication that preceded the double domain structure. In addition, our structure comparison methodology demonstrates a general approach to problems where the components have a high intrinsic level of similarity.

Abstract Image

泡沫和正位病毒衣壳结构的比较分析揭示了一个古老的区域重复
Spumaretrovirinae(泡沫病毒)和Orthoretrovirinae(如HIV)在基因组结构和核心病毒编码蛋白(如天冬氨酸蛋白酶和逆转录酶)的序列上有许多相似之处。基因组gag区域的相似性在序列水平上不太明显,但最近泡沫病毒衣壳(CA)结构的解决方案已经阐明。这揭示了与正转录酶病毒衣壳在结构上的明显相似性,但也有明显的差异,这使得构成该结构的两个结构域之间的关系不确定。我们已经应用了蛋白质结构比较的方法来试图解决这种模糊的关系。这些方法包括DALI方法和SAP方法,并对两种方法的结果进行了严格的统计测试。为此,我们采用人工折叠“诱饵”集合(由被比较的一对本地结构产生)为每个比较提供定制的背景分布,从而允许估计显著性水平。我们已经证明,这两个域的关系符合一个简单的线性对应,而不是一个域的转置。这些相似性表明两种病毒衣壳的起源是具有双结构域结构的共同祖先。此外,我们发现泡沫病毒和正位病毒的氨基和羧基结构域之间也存在显著的结构相似性。这些结果表明,除了双结构域衣壳的复制外,在双结构域结构之前可能存在更古老的基因复制。此外,我们的结构比较方法展示了解决组件具有高内在相似性的问题的一般方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Structural Biology
BMC Structural Biology 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Structural Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on investigations into the structure of biological macromolecules, including solving structures, structural and functional analyses, and computational modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信