Reintroduction of Parent-Reared and Semi-Wild Chicks of Red-Crowned Grus japonensis and White-Naped Cranes Antigone vipio in Russia: Lessons from 29 Years of Experience

IF 0.5 4区 生物学 Q4 ORNITHOLOGY
Eugenia V. Bragina, Irina Balan, N. Kuznetsova, M. Parilov, Jonathan C. Slaght
{"title":"Reintroduction of Parent-Reared and Semi-Wild Chicks of Red-Crowned Grus japonensis and White-Naped Cranes Antigone vipio in Russia: Lessons from 29 Years of Experience","authors":"Eugenia V. Bragina, Irina Balan, N. Kuznetsova, M. Parilov, Jonathan C. Slaght","doi":"10.2326/osj.21.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Red-crowned Grus japonensis (IUCN status: Endangered) and White-naped Antigone vipio (IUCN status: Vulnerable) cranes are both rare, with wild populations of ∼3,000 and ∼6,000 individuals, respectively. Since 1991, the Rare Bird Reintroduction Station at the Khingansky State Nature Reserve, Russia, has been rearing and reintroducing chicks of both species to bolster wild populations. The station uses two different chick-rearing methods: (1) the “parent-reared” method, in which chicks are raised in enclosures by natural parents and stay with them until their release into the wild, and (2) the “semi-wild” method, a modification of hand-rearing, in which cohorts of 2–7 chicks spend most of their time together in an enclosure but are guided on daily excursions outside the enclosure, under supervision of a keeper from a distance of 30–50 m. We have assessed and compared apparent survival of crane chicks reared under these methods. Of the 165 juveniles released into the wild from 1991–2019 (104 Red-crowned; 61 White-naped), no difference was found between apparent survival of parent-reared and semi-wild chicks. Six-month apparent survival of Red-crowned Cranes was 84.2% (95% confidence interval: 75.3–90.3%); for White-naped Cranes –89.5% (95% CI: 83.9–93.3%). Both parent-reared and semi-wild chicks were later observed in mated pairs with their own offspring (17 chicks in total), coupling with either other reintroduced birds or with wild individuals. We conclude that both the parent-reared and semi-wild methods had similar outcomes with respect to apparent survival. However, since the semi-wild method is less costly with respect to time (i.e., more juveniles can be released annually using this method) we recommend that it be used whenever possible to bolster these Endangered and Vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":49009,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.21.53","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Red-crowned Grus japonensis (IUCN status: Endangered) and White-naped Antigone vipio (IUCN status: Vulnerable) cranes are both rare, with wild populations of ∼3,000 and ∼6,000 individuals, respectively. Since 1991, the Rare Bird Reintroduction Station at the Khingansky State Nature Reserve, Russia, has been rearing and reintroducing chicks of both species to bolster wild populations. The station uses two different chick-rearing methods: (1) the “parent-reared” method, in which chicks are raised in enclosures by natural parents and stay with them until their release into the wild, and (2) the “semi-wild” method, a modification of hand-rearing, in which cohorts of 2–7 chicks spend most of their time together in an enclosure but are guided on daily excursions outside the enclosure, under supervision of a keeper from a distance of 30–50 m. We have assessed and compared apparent survival of crane chicks reared under these methods. Of the 165 juveniles released into the wild from 1991–2019 (104 Red-crowned; 61 White-naped), no difference was found between apparent survival of parent-reared and semi-wild chicks. Six-month apparent survival of Red-crowned Cranes was 84.2% (95% confidence interval: 75.3–90.3%); for White-naped Cranes –89.5% (95% CI: 83.9–93.3%). Both parent-reared and semi-wild chicks were later observed in mated pairs with their own offspring (17 chicks in total), coupling with either other reintroduced birds or with wild individuals. We conclude that both the parent-reared and semi-wild methods had similar outcomes with respect to apparent survival. However, since the semi-wild method is less costly with respect to time (i.e., more juveniles can be released annually using this method) we recommend that it be used whenever possible to bolster these Endangered and Vulnerable populations.
俄罗斯丹顶鹤和白枕鹤双亲饲养和半野生雏鸟的重新引进:29年经验的教训
日本丹顶鹤(IUCN状态:濒危)和安提戈涅白颈鹤(IUCN状态:易危)都是稀有物种,野生种群数量分别为~ 3000和~ 6000只。自1991年以来,俄罗斯兴安斯基国家自然保护区的珍稀鸟类重新引入站一直在饲养和重新引入这两个物种的雏鸟,以增加野生种群。该站采用两种不同的养鸡方法:(1)“父母饲养”方法,雏鸡由自然父母在围栏中饲养,并与它们在一起直到它们被释放到野外;(2)“半野生”方法,一种人工饲养的改进方法,其中2 - 7只雏鸡在围栏中度过大部分时间,但在30-50米距离的饲养员的指导下,每天在围栏外远足。我们评估和比较了在这些方法下饲养的鹤雏鸡的表观存活率。在1991年至2019年期间释放到野外的165只幼鸟中(104只红冠;(61白颈),父母饲养的雏鸟和半野生雏鸟的明显存活率没有差异。丹顶鹤6个月表观存活率为84.2%(95%可信区间为75.3 ~ 90.3%);白枕鹤-89.5% (95% CI: 83.9-93.3%)。随后观察到父母饲养的和半野生的雏鸟与自己的后代(总共17只雏鸟)成对交配,与其他重新引入的鸟类或与野生个体交配。我们得出的结论是,双亲饲养和半野生方法在表观存活率方面具有相似的结果。然而,由于半野生方法在时间上的成本较低(即,每年可以使用这种方法释放更多的青少年),我们建议尽可能使用它来支持这些濒危和脆弱的种群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ornithological Science
Ornithological Science ORNITHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ornithological Science publishes reviews, original articles, short communications and comments covering all aspects of ornithology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper. Manuscript are edited where necessary for clarify and economy. Ornithological Science aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信