Early outcome of management of Bladder Carcinoma in Octogenarian at Tertiary care hospital

N. Thapa, B. Thapa, Sunil Basukala, B. Bhandari, Anjit Phuyal
{"title":"Early outcome of management of Bladder Carcinoma in Octogenarian at Tertiary care hospital","authors":"N. Thapa, B. Thapa, Sunil Basukala, B. Bhandari, Anjit Phuyal","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v21i1.41597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Urothelial bladder cancer is a cancer of environment and age, and its incidence increases with age peaking in the 80s. Unlike in other malignancies in which cancer tends to be aggressive in young individuals, the probability of developing muscle invasive bladder cancer increases with age. The standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy. However, there is controversy regarding the outcome of radical cystectomy in elderly patients, especially more than 80 years.\nMethods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. All patients > 80 years of age with bladder carcinoma were included in the study. A patient with good functional status was offered Radical Cystectomy. Patients not fit for surgery or refusing surgery were managed with TURBT.\nResults: A total of 23 patients were included in the study. Out of which, 13 patients underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit and while ten patients who refused surgery were managed with TURBT and chemotherapy. The prognosis of patients with MIBC managed with TURBT was within 1 year. While patients who have undergone RC had survived more than 1 year.\nConclusions: Radical Cystectomy is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for the carefully selected octogenarian. Age is just a number and should not be an absolute contraindication for radical cystectomy in patients with non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v21i1.41597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Urothelial bladder cancer is a cancer of environment and age, and its incidence increases with age peaking in the 80s. Unlike in other malignancies in which cancer tends to be aggressive in young individuals, the probability of developing muscle invasive bladder cancer increases with age. The standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy. However, there is controversy regarding the outcome of radical cystectomy in elderly patients, especially more than 80 years. Methods: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. All patients > 80 years of age with bladder carcinoma were included in the study. A patient with good functional status was offered Radical Cystectomy. Patients not fit for surgery or refusing surgery were managed with TURBT. Results: A total of 23 patients were included in the study. Out of which, 13 patients underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit and while ten patients who refused surgery were managed with TURBT and chemotherapy. The prognosis of patients with MIBC managed with TURBT was within 1 year. While patients who have undergone RC had survived more than 1 year. Conclusions: Radical Cystectomy is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for the carefully selected octogenarian. Age is just a number and should not be an absolute contraindication for radical cystectomy in patients with non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer.
三级医院治疗八旬老人膀胱癌的早期疗效
简介:癌症尿路上皮癌是一种环境和年龄的癌症,其发病率在80年代达到高峰,随年龄的增长而增加。与癌症在年轻人中具有侵袭性的其他恶性肿瘤不同,发展为肌肉浸润性膀胱癌症的可能性随着年龄的增长而增加。非味觉肌肉浸润性膀胱癌症的标准治疗方法是根治性膀胱切除术。然而,对于老年患者,尤其是80岁以上的老年患者,根治性膀胱切除术的结果存在争议。方法:这是一项前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。所有年龄大于80岁的膀胱癌患者均纳入研究。一名功能状态良好的患者接受了根治性膀胱切除术。不适合手术或拒绝手术的患者采用TURBT进行治疗。结果:本研究共纳入23例患者。其中,13名患者接受了回肠导管根治性膀胱切除术(RC),10名拒绝手术的患者接受了TURBT和化疗。TURBT治疗的MIBC患者的预后在1年内。而接受RC的患者存活了1年以上。结论:对于精心挑选的八旬老人,根治性膀胱切除术是一种安全、可行、有效的治疗方案。年龄只是一个数字,不应该是非味觉肌肉浸润性癌症患者根治性膀胱切除术的绝对禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信