{"title":"Building the dance community virtually during COVID-19","authors":"Dale Schmid, Susan McGreevy-Nichols","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.1931598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the advent of the global pandemic wrought by COVID-19, much of the world’s citizenry was forced to immediately pivot to new ways of doing business. This included shifting instructional delivery systems around the globe to online platforms. In the US and elsewhere, the dance education community displayed remarkable resiliency and perhaps more importantly – an amazing affinity for communal problem solving. As the nation’s leading, nonprofit, membership organization dedicated to advancing dance education centered in the arts, the National Dance Education Organization (NDEO), “Identifies and acts in constructive and strategic ways to positively shape public, social and education policy about and for dance in education…” Accordingly, NDEO played a major role as a convener of dance educators throughout the US to problem solve how to provide equitable access to quality opportunities for learning in dance, delivered in a responsibly socially distanced manner as dictated by the latest science. This article highlights salient aspects of the shared journey of the dance education community during the pandemic. What is chronicled here is a demonstration of ways in which dance education is better due to collective impact of a cross-section of the nations’ dance educators, acting as stewards of the art of dance.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"123 1","pages":"135 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1931598","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1931598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Abstract With the advent of the global pandemic wrought by COVID-19, much of the world’s citizenry was forced to immediately pivot to new ways of doing business. This included shifting instructional delivery systems around the globe to online platforms. In the US and elsewhere, the dance education community displayed remarkable resiliency and perhaps more importantly – an amazing affinity for communal problem solving. As the nation’s leading, nonprofit, membership organization dedicated to advancing dance education centered in the arts, the National Dance Education Organization (NDEO), “Identifies and acts in constructive and strategic ways to positively shape public, social and education policy about and for dance in education…” Accordingly, NDEO played a major role as a convener of dance educators throughout the US to problem solve how to provide equitable access to quality opportunities for learning in dance, delivered in a responsibly socially distanced manner as dictated by the latest science. This article highlights salient aspects of the shared journey of the dance education community during the pandemic. What is chronicled here is a demonstration of ways in which dance education is better due to collective impact of a cross-section of the nations’ dance educators, acting as stewards of the art of dance.
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.