Institutional Policy in Land Procurement Under The Omnibus Law Regime

Imam Kuswahyono, Hikmatul Ula
{"title":"Institutional Policy in Land Procurement Under The Omnibus Law Regime","authors":"Imam Kuswahyono, Hikmatul Ula","doi":"10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal culture procedure with socio-legal analysis will be able to answer the fundamental questions in the problems of practices of land procurement for public interests, in particular the issue of compensation. The crucial issue of compensation within the implementation of the policy of land procurement regards the non-equivalence of land value, both utility value and economic value of structures and landscapes, to the monetary compensation. The use of the legal culture approach is to provide answers and implement them to resolve issues of land procurement for public interests in the omnibus law regime to maintain justice to landowners and preserve the environment. The correlation of the cultural approach and activities of land procurement is that culture refers to the target of the national conscience, and the cultural approach based on the growth mindset will result in wisdom and nobility of the decisions of public officials to prioritize the people rather than interests of investment. The government must choose to renegotiate the policy of enacting the Law of Employment Creation, which is judged by the greater public to conflict with the spirit and mandate of the Preamble and contents of the 1945 Constitution. It needs renegotiation between the state and people by discussing in-depth the legal substance of the law is not performed, and then the law in question must have its enactment firmly rejected.","PeriodicalId":31451,"journal":{"name":"Brawijaya Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brawijaya Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The legal culture procedure with socio-legal analysis will be able to answer the fundamental questions in the problems of practices of land procurement for public interests, in particular the issue of compensation. The crucial issue of compensation within the implementation of the policy of land procurement regards the non-equivalence of land value, both utility value and economic value of structures and landscapes, to the monetary compensation. The use of the legal culture approach is to provide answers and implement them to resolve issues of land procurement for public interests in the omnibus law regime to maintain justice to landowners and preserve the environment. The correlation of the cultural approach and activities of land procurement is that culture refers to the target of the national conscience, and the cultural approach based on the growth mindset will result in wisdom and nobility of the decisions of public officials to prioritize the people rather than interests of investment. The government must choose to renegotiate the policy of enacting the Law of Employment Creation, which is judged by the greater public to conflict with the spirit and mandate of the Preamble and contents of the 1945 Constitution. It needs renegotiation between the state and people by discussing in-depth the legal substance of the law is not performed, and then the law in question must have its enactment firmly rejected.
综合法律制度下的土地征用制度政策
具有社会法律分析的法律文化程序将能够回答为公共利益采购土地的实践问题中的基本问题,特别是补偿问题。在实施土地采购政策过程中,补偿的关键问题是土地价值,包括结构和景观的效用价值和经济价值,与货币补偿不相等。法律文化方法的使用是提供答案并加以实施,以解决综合法律制度中为公共利益而进行的土地采购问题,从而维护土地所有者的正义并保护环境。文化方法与土地采购活动的相关性在于,文化指的是民族良知的目标,而基于增长心态的文化方法将使公职人员做出明智而高尚的决定,优先考虑人民而不是投资利益。政府必须选择重新谈判制定《创造就业法》的政策,广大公众认为这与序言的精神和授权以及1945年《宪法》的内容相冲突。它需要国家和人民通过深入讨论法律的法律实质没有得到履行来重新谈判,然后必须坚决拒绝有关法律的颁布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信