Milking practices on commercial Holstein-Friesian farms

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
L. Ózsvári, Dorottya Ivanyos
{"title":"Milking practices on commercial Holstein-Friesian farms","authors":"L. Ózsvári, Dorottya Ivanyos","doi":"10.37496/rbz5020200280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to survey and analyze milking practices of commercial Holstein-Friesian farms. A total of 43 Hungarian dairy farms with 31,430 cows was surveyed by using a questionnaire via personal interviews. Furthermore, seven in-depth, individual interviews were conducted with farm managers. In the statistical analysis, we used ANOVA models. The results showed that 57.8% of the milking parlors had a herringbone design, followed by parallel (20.0%) and rotary (17.8%) milking systems. For the interviewed farm managers, gentle (71.4%) and quick milking (57.1%) as well as herd size (57.1%) were the most important factors in determining the milking system design. In 62.8% of the farms, cows were milked twice a day, and the average milking time was 5.0 h with an average of 3.1 laborers. The average daily milking time per cow was 15 min and the average daily walking time per cow to the milking parlor and back was 24 min. Furthermore, 85.4% of the farms used traditional elastic milk liners, whereas 14.6% used silicone ones. In total, 57.1% of the interviewed farm managers said that the ideal teat liner should fit the teats correctly and provide gentle milking. Prior to milking, 65.1% of the farms used disinfectant dip and 11.6% used a disinfectant wash, whereas 23.3% still washed the udder with water. The udder was wiped with paper towels in 73.8% of the herds and with cloth in 26.2% of the herds. Forestripping was performed in all herds: 51.2% onto the floor, 46.5% into a cup, and in 2.3% into a paper towel. Further, 85.7% of the interviewed farm managers considered the use of a cup to be the ideal method, but 57.1% deemed a dark-colored piece of rubber/flooring to be similarly acceptable. Cows with mastitis were milked separately in 91.9% of the farms.","PeriodicalId":49614,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to survey and analyze milking practices of commercial Holstein-Friesian farms. A total of 43 Hungarian dairy farms with 31,430 cows was surveyed by using a questionnaire via personal interviews. Furthermore, seven in-depth, individual interviews were conducted with farm managers. In the statistical analysis, we used ANOVA models. The results showed that 57.8% of the milking parlors had a herringbone design, followed by parallel (20.0%) and rotary (17.8%) milking systems. For the interviewed farm managers, gentle (71.4%) and quick milking (57.1%) as well as herd size (57.1%) were the most important factors in determining the milking system design. In 62.8% of the farms, cows were milked twice a day, and the average milking time was 5.0 h with an average of 3.1 laborers. The average daily milking time per cow was 15 min and the average daily walking time per cow to the milking parlor and back was 24 min. Furthermore, 85.4% of the farms used traditional elastic milk liners, whereas 14.6% used silicone ones. In total, 57.1% of the interviewed farm managers said that the ideal teat liner should fit the teats correctly and provide gentle milking. Prior to milking, 65.1% of the farms used disinfectant dip and 11.6% used a disinfectant wash, whereas 23.3% still washed the udder with water. The udder was wiped with paper towels in 73.8% of the herds and with cloth in 26.2% of the herds. Forestripping was performed in all herds: 51.2% onto the floor, 46.5% into a cup, and in 2.3% into a paper towel. Further, 85.7% of the interviewed farm managers considered the use of a cup to be the ideal method, but 57.1% deemed a dark-colored piece of rubber/flooring to be similarly acceptable. Cows with mastitis were milked separately in 91.9% of the farms.
荷斯泰因-弗里西亚商业农场的挤奶实践
摘要本研究的目的是调查和分析荷尔斯泰因-弗里森商业农场的挤奶实践。通过个人访谈,对43个匈牙利奶牛场(31430头奶牛)进行了问卷调查。此外,还对农场管理人员进行了七次深入的个人访谈。在统计分析中,我们使用了方差分析模型。结果显示,57.8%的挤奶厅采用人字形设计,其次是平行挤奶系统(20.0%)和旋转挤奶系统(17.8%)。对于受访的农场管理人员来说,温和挤奶(71.4%)、快速挤奶(57.1%)以及牛群规模(57.1%)是决定挤奶系统设计的最重要因素。62.8%的奶牛场每天挤奶两次,平均挤奶时间为5.0小时,平均3.1名工人。每头牛的平均每日挤奶时间为15分钟,每头牛往返挤奶厅的平均每日步行时间为24分钟。此外,85.4%的农场使用传统的弹性牛奶衬垫,而14.6%的农场使用硅胶衬垫。总的来说,57.1%的受访农场经理表示,理想的乳头衬垫应该正确贴合乳头,并提供温和的挤奶。挤奶前,65.1%的农场使用消毒剂蘸液,11.6%的农场使用消毒液,而23.3%的农场仍然用水清洗乳房。73.8%的牛群用纸巾擦拭乳房,26.2%的牛群用布擦拭乳房。所有鹿群都进行了森林砍伐:51.2%的鹿群倒在地板上,46.5%的鹿群放在杯子里,2.3%的鹿群则放在纸巾里。此外,85.7%的受访农场经理认为使用杯子是理想的方法,但57.1%的人认为深色橡胶/地板也是可以接受的。91.9%的奶牛场分别对患有乳腺炎的奶牛挤奶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ; Brazilian Journal of Animal Science) encompasses all fields of Animal Science Research. The RBZ publishes original scientific articles in the areas of Aquaculture, Biometeorology and Animal Welfare, Forage Crops and Grasslands, Animal and Forage Plants Breeding and Genetics, Animal Reproduction, Ruminant and Non-Ruminant Nutrition, and Animal Production Systems and Agribusiness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信