Efficacy and Safety Profile of Berberine Treatment in Improving Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-blind Trials

Lubi Lei, Jingkuo Li, Bin Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety Profile of Berberine Treatment in Improving Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-blind Trials","authors":"Lubi Lei, Jingkuo Li, Bin Wang","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of berberine treatment in improving blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure as well as the associated safety profile. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database were searched from the establishment of the database to December 31, 2021, to identify randomized, double-blind trials that examined the effect of berberine alone or as add-on treatment on blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure with an intervention period of at least 3 months. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of each study according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The efficacy outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FPG), 2-hour post-prandial glucose (2hPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The safety outcome was the incidence of the total number of adverse events. Results: A total of 17 articles enrolling 1,485 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The intervention duration ranged from 12 to 24 weeks. Sixteen trials reported results for blood glucose, 14 trials reported results for blood lipids, and 7 reported results for blood pressure. Compared with placebo or baseline treatment, berberine alone or as add-on therapy significantly reduced FPG (by 0.35 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13–0.58 mmol/L; P = 0.002; I2 = 89.0%, n = 16), 2hPG (by 1.50 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.50–2.49 mmol/L, P = 0.003, I2 = 84.1%, n = 4), HbA1c (by 0.45%, 95% CI: 0.24%–0.65%, P < 0.001, I2 = 82.8%, n = 9), TC (by 0.48 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.36–0.60 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 72.3%, n = 13), TG (by 0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.13–0.31 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 57.1%, n = 14), and LDL-C (by 0.41 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.34–0.48 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 35.0%, n = 12). The effect on blood glucose and blood lipids remained consistent when confined to high-quality trials. There is no significant effect of berberine treatment on HDL-C, SBP, and DBP. The incidence of the total number of adverse events was similar between the berberine group and the control group (risk ratio (RR) = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84–1.19, P = 0.961). Gastrointestinal disorder was the most common adverse event in the berberine group and most adverse events were alleviated or disappeared as the dose was decreased or the intervention time was prolonged. Conclusions: Short-term berberine treatment significantly improved blood glucose and blood lipid profiles without raising safety concerns. A rigorously designed randomized controlled trial could be considered to examine the feasibility of the long-term application of berberine treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of berberine treatment in improving blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure as well as the associated safety profile. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database were searched from the establishment of the database to December 31, 2021, to identify randomized, double-blind trials that examined the effect of berberine alone or as add-on treatment on blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure with an intervention period of at least 3 months. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of each study according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The efficacy outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FPG), 2-hour post-prandial glucose (2hPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The safety outcome was the incidence of the total number of adverse events. Results: A total of 17 articles enrolling 1,485 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The intervention duration ranged from 12 to 24 weeks. Sixteen trials reported results for blood glucose, 14 trials reported results for blood lipids, and 7 reported results for blood pressure. Compared with placebo or baseline treatment, berberine alone or as add-on therapy significantly reduced FPG (by 0.35 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13–0.58 mmol/L; P = 0.002; I2 = 89.0%, n = 16), 2hPG (by 1.50 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.50–2.49 mmol/L, P = 0.003, I2 = 84.1%, n = 4), HbA1c (by 0.45%, 95% CI: 0.24%–0.65%, P < 0.001, I2 = 82.8%, n = 9), TC (by 0.48 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.36–0.60 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 72.3%, n = 13), TG (by 0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.13–0.31 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 57.1%, n = 14), and LDL-C (by 0.41 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.34–0.48 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 35.0%, n = 12). The effect on blood glucose and blood lipids remained consistent when confined to high-quality trials. There is no significant effect of berberine treatment on HDL-C, SBP, and DBP. The incidence of the total number of adverse events was similar between the berberine group and the control group (risk ratio (RR) = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84–1.19, P = 0.961). Gastrointestinal disorder was the most common adverse event in the berberine group and most adverse events were alleviated or disappeared as the dose was decreased or the intervention time was prolonged. Conclusions: Short-term berberine treatment significantly improved blood glucose and blood lipid profiles without raising safety concerns. A rigorously designed randomized controlled trial could be considered to examine the feasibility of the long-term application of berberine treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
黄连素治疗改善心血管疾病危险因素的疗效和安全性:随机双盲试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估小檗碱治疗在改善血糖、血脂和血压方面的疗效以及相关的安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、万方数据和中国国家知识基础设施数据库,检索自数据库建立至2021年12月31日的随机双盲试验,研究黄连素单独或辅助治疗对血糖、血脂和血压的影响,干预期至少为3个月。两名研究人员独立筛选文章,提取数据,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目评估每个研究的质量。疗效指标包括空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2小时血糖(2hPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。安全性结局是不良事件总数的发生率。结果:meta分析共纳入17篇文献,1485名受试者。干预时间为12 ~ 24周。16项试验报告了血糖结果,14项试验报告了血脂结果,7项试验报告了血压结果。与安慰剂或基线治疗相比,黄连素单独或附加治疗显著降低FPG (0.35 mmol/L;95%置信区间(CI): 0.13-0.58 mmol/L;P = 0.002;I2 = 89.0%, n = 16), 2hPG(减1.50 mmol/L;95% CI: 0.50 ~ 2.49 mmol/L, P = 0.003, I2 = 84.1%, n = 4), HbA1c(下降0.45%,95% CI: 0.24% ~ 0.65%, P < 0.001, I2 = 82.8%, n = 9), TC(下降0.48 mmol/L;95% CI: 0.36-0.60 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 72.3%, n = 13), TG (0.22 mmol/L;95% CI: 0.13-0.31 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 57.1%, n = 14), LDL-C (0.41 mmol/L;95% CI: 0.34 ~ 0.48 mmol/L, P < 0.001, I2 = 35.0%, n = 12)。在高质量的试验中,对血糖和血脂的影响保持一致。小檗碱治疗对HDL-C、收缩压和舒张压无显著影响。黄连素组与对照组不良事件总发生率相似(RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84 ~ 1.19, P = 0.961)。胃肠道紊乱是小檗碱组最常见的不良事件,随着剂量的减少或干预时间的延长,大多数不良事件减轻或消失。结论:短期小檗碱治疗可显著改善血糖和血脂,且无安全性问题。可考虑设计严谨的随机对照试验,以检验黄连素长期应用于预防心血管疾病的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信