Comparing the Formation and Characteristics of Use-Wear Traces on Flint, Chert, Dolerite and Quartz

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Alessandro Aleo
{"title":"Comparing the Formation and Characteristics of Use-Wear Traces on Flint, Chert, Dolerite and Quartz","authors":"Alessandro Aleo","doi":"10.1080/01977261.2022.2103297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Use-wear traces are considered to be material specific. The use of an appropriate reference collection is thus fundamental for interpreting tools' function. To test whether a flint reference collection can be used to interpret the function of non-flint tools, I conducted experiments using chert, dolerite, and quartz endscrapers and flakes. I compared wear traces obtained during the experiment with use-wear on experimental flint tools exposed to the same variables (motion, contact material, time). The results highlighted strong similarities in the characteristics and distribution of traces on chert and flint. Dolerite and quartz differ from flint, especially regarding the distribution and appearance of use-polish. However, shared traits were observed in all the raw materials involved in this experiment, demonstrating a certain degree of comparability between use-wear traces on flint and non-flint rocks. Based on the data, a flint reference collection can allow a basic interpretation of use-wear also on different rocks.","PeriodicalId":45597,"journal":{"name":"Lithic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2022.2103297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Use-wear traces are considered to be material specific. The use of an appropriate reference collection is thus fundamental for interpreting tools' function. To test whether a flint reference collection can be used to interpret the function of non-flint tools, I conducted experiments using chert, dolerite, and quartz endscrapers and flakes. I compared wear traces obtained during the experiment with use-wear on experimental flint tools exposed to the same variables (motion, contact material, time). The results highlighted strong similarities in the characteristics and distribution of traces on chert and flint. Dolerite and quartz differ from flint, especially regarding the distribution and appearance of use-polish. However, shared traits were observed in all the raw materials involved in this experiment, demonstrating a certain degree of comparability between use-wear traces on flint and non-flint rocks. Based on the data, a flint reference collection can allow a basic interpretation of use-wear also on different rocks.
燧石、燧石、白云石和石英使用磨损痕迹的形成及特征比较
摘要使用磨损痕迹被视为特定材料。因此,使用适当的参考资料集是解释工具功能的基础。为了测试燧石参考集合是否可以用于解释非燧石工具的功能,我使用燧石、粗玄岩和石英刮头器和薄片进行了实验。我将实验期间获得的磨损痕迹与暴露于相同变量(运动、接触材料、时间)的实验燧石工具的使用磨损进行了比较。研究结果突出了燧石和燧石上痕迹的特征和分布的强烈相似性。白云石和石英不同于燧石,特别是在使用抛光剂的分布和外观方面。然而,在本实验中涉及的所有原材料中都观察到了共同的特征,这表明燧石和非燧石上的使用磨损痕迹具有一定程度的可比性。根据这些数据,燧石参考资料可以对不同岩石的使用磨损进行基本解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lithic Technology
Lithic Technology Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信