Tratamento da osteoporose pós‐menopáusica: um algoritmo baseado na literatura para uso no sistema público de saúde

Q Medicine
Ellen Luz Pereira Caires , Mailze Campos Bezerra , Ana Flávia Torquato de Araújo Junqueira , Sheila Márcia de Araújo Fontenele , Silvana Cristina de Albuquerque Andrade , Catarina Brasil d’Alva
{"title":"Tratamento da osteoporose pós‐menopáusica: um algoritmo baseado na literatura para uso no sistema público de saúde","authors":"Ellen Luz Pereira Caires ,&nbsp;Mailze Campos Bezerra ,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Torquato de Araújo Junqueira ,&nbsp;Sheila Márcia de Araújo Fontenele ,&nbsp;Silvana Cristina de Albuquerque Andrade ,&nbsp;Catarina Brasil d’Alva","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bisphosphonates are considered first‐line agents in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis based on extensive experience of use, safety, and proven efficacy in reducing vertebral, non‐vertebral and femur fractures. However, post‐marketing reports based on the treatment of millions of patients/year over lengthy periods of time have revealed the occurrence of initially unexpected adverse effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture, leading to the restriction of treatment duration with bisphosphonates by global regulatory agencies. However, despite the association between these effects and bisphosphonates, this risk should be analyzed in the context of osteoporosis treatment, alongside the benefit of preventing osteoporotic fractures and their clinical consequences. Therefore, we consider it plausible to discuss the restriction to the use of bisphosphonates, possible indications for prolonged treatment and alternative therapies following the suspension of this drug class for patients with persistent high risk of fracture after initial treatment, especially considering the problems of public health funding in Brazil and the shortage of drugs provided by the government. Thus, to standardize the treatment of osteoporosis in the public health care system, we aim to develop a proposal for a scientifically‐based pharmacological treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, establishing criteria for indication and allowing the rational use of each pharmacological agent. We discuss the duration of the initial bisphosphonate treatment, the therapeutic options for refractory patients and potential indications of other classes of drugs as first‐choice treatment in the sphere of public health, in which assessing risk and cost effectiveness is a priority.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.12.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416301887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are considered first‐line agents in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis based on extensive experience of use, safety, and proven efficacy in reducing vertebral, non‐vertebral and femur fractures. However, post‐marketing reports based on the treatment of millions of patients/year over lengthy periods of time have revealed the occurrence of initially unexpected adverse effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture, leading to the restriction of treatment duration with bisphosphonates by global regulatory agencies. However, despite the association between these effects and bisphosphonates, this risk should be analyzed in the context of osteoporosis treatment, alongside the benefit of preventing osteoporotic fractures and their clinical consequences. Therefore, we consider it plausible to discuss the restriction to the use of bisphosphonates, possible indications for prolonged treatment and alternative therapies following the suspension of this drug class for patients with persistent high risk of fracture after initial treatment, especially considering the problems of public health funding in Brazil and the shortage of drugs provided by the government. Thus, to standardize the treatment of osteoporosis in the public health care system, we aim to develop a proposal for a scientifically‐based pharmacological treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, establishing criteria for indication and allowing the rational use of each pharmacological agent. We discuss the duration of the initial bisphosphonate treatment, the therapeutic options for refractory patients and potential indications of other classes of drugs as first‐choice treatment in the sphere of public health, in which assessing risk and cost effectiveness is a priority.

绝经后骨质疏松症的治疗:一种在公共卫生系统中使用的基于文献的算法
基于广泛的使用经验、安全性和已证实的减少椎体、非椎体和股骨骨折的疗效,双膦酸盐被认为是治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的一线药物。然而,基于长期治疗数百万患者/年的上市后报告显示,出现了最初意想不到的不良反应,如颌骨骨坏死和非典型股骨骨折,导致全球监管机构限制了双膦酸盐的治疗时间。然而,尽管这些作用与双膦酸盐之间存在关联,但应该在骨质疏松症治疗的背景下分析这种风险,以及预防骨质疏松性骨折的益处及其临床后果。因此,我们认为有必要讨论对初始治疗后骨折风险持续较高的患者限制使用双膦酸盐、可能的长期治疗适应症和替代疗法,特别是考虑到巴西公共卫生资金问题和政府提供的药物短缺。因此,为了在公共卫生保健系统中规范骨质疏松症的治疗,我们的目标是制定一项基于科学的绝经后骨质疏松症药物治疗建议,建立适应症标准并允许合理使用每种药物。我们讨论了初始双膦酸盐治疗的持续时间,难治性患者的治疗选择以及其他类别药物作为公共卫生领域首选治疗的潜在适应症,其中评估风险和成本效益是优先考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.82
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信