Irreducible ambiguity? The line between custom and statute in the law-making of thirteenth-century Poland

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
P. Gorecki
{"title":"Irreducible ambiguity? The line between custom and statute in the law-making of thirteenth-century Poland","authors":"P. Gorecki","doi":"10.1093/hisres/htad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A resurging subject today is medieval customary law and its boundary with statute. Regarding Poland, the inquiry is complicated by a historiographical consensus that here the law essentially was customary, supplemented by statute only in the later fourteenth century. This certainty has reduced legal reality to unwarranted uniformity. In response, I survey the terminology related to custom and statute, examine one document bridging that terminology and an enactment resembling a statute, and place that enactment in a long earlier legacy of written rule-making. This is not a sharp transition from custom to statute, but an evolving sequence of written expression.","PeriodicalId":13059,"journal":{"name":"Historical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htad013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A resurging subject today is medieval customary law and its boundary with statute. Regarding Poland, the inquiry is complicated by a historiographical consensus that here the law essentially was customary, supplemented by statute only in the later fourteenth century. This certainty has reduced legal reality to unwarranted uniformity. In response, I survey the terminology related to custom and statute, examine one document bridging that terminology and an enactment resembling a statute, and place that enactment in a long earlier legacy of written rule-making. This is not a sharp transition from custom to statute, but an evolving sequence of written expression.
不可约歧义?13世纪波兰法律制定中习惯与成文法的界限
今天,一个复兴的主题是中世纪习惯法及其与法规的界限。关于波兰,历史上的共识使调查变得复杂,即这里的法律基本上是习惯法,直到14世纪后期才有法规补充。这种确定性使法律现实变得毫无根据的统一。作为回应,我调查了与习俗和法规相关的术语,审查了一份将该术语与类似法规的法规联系起来的文件,并将该法规置于更早的成文规则制定遗产中。这不是一个从习俗到法规的急剧转变,而是一个不断演变的书面表达序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1923, Historical Research has been a leading mainstream British historical journal. Its articles cover a wide geographical and temporal span: from the early middle ages to the twentieth century. It encourages the submission of articles from a broad variety of approaches, including social, political, urban, intellectual and cultural history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信